Literature DB >> 20554832

The h current is a candidate mechanism for regulating the sliding modification threshold in a BCM-like synaptic learning rule.

Rishikesh Narayanan1, Daniel Johnston.   

Abstract

Hebbian synaptic plasticity acts as a positive feedback mechanism and can destabilize a neuronal network unless concomitant homeostatic processes that counterbalance this instability are activated. Within a Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM)-like plasticity framework, such compensation is achieved through a modification threshold that slides in an activity-dependent fashion. Although the BCM-like plasticity framework has been a useful formulation to understand synaptic plasticity and metaplasticity, a mechanism for the activity-dependent regulation of this modification threshold has remained an open question. In this simulation study based on CA1 pyramidal cells, we use a modification of the calcium-dependent hypothesis proposed elsewhere and show that a change in the hyperpolarization-activated, nonspecific-cation h current is capable of shifting the modification threshold. Based on the direction of such a shift in relation to changes in the h current, and supported by previous experimental results, we argue that the h current fits the requirements for an activity-dependent regulator of this modification threshold. Additionally, using the same framework, we show that multiple voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels present in a neuronal compartment can regulate the modification threshold through complex interactions among themselves. Our results underscore the heavy mutual interdependence of synaptic and intrinsic properties/plasticity in regulating learning and homeostasis in single neurons and their networks under both physiological and pathological brain states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554832      PMCID: PMC2934916          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01129.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  110 in total

Review 1.  Emerging rules for the distributions of active dendritic conductances.

Authors:  Michele Migliore; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.

Authors:  Robert C Malenka; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity depends on dendritic location.

Authors:  Robert C Froemke; Mu-Ming Poo; Yang Dan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A biophysical basis for the inter-spike interaction of spike-timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Neel T Shah; Luk Chong Yeung; Leon N Cooper; Yidao Cai; Harel Z Shouval
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  A biophysical model of synaptic plasticity and metaplasticity can account for the dynamics of the backward shift of hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  Xintian Yu; Harel Z Shouval; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Glutamate receptor dynamics in dendritic microdomains.

Authors:  Thomas M Newpher; Michael D Ehlers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  A mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes underlying learning and memory.

Authors:  J Lisman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Mechanism for a sliding synaptic modification threshold.

Authors:  M F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The effects of repetitive low frequency stimulation on control and "potentiated" synaptic responses in the hippocampus.

Authors:  G Barrionuevo; F Schottler; G Lynch
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1980-12-15       Impact factor: 5.037

10.  G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels mediate depotentiation of long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Hee Jung Chung; Woo-Ping Ge; Xiang Qian; Ofer Wiser; Yuh Nung Jan; Lily Yeh Jan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  41 in total

1.  Tonic nanomolar dopamine enables an activity-dependent phase recovery mechanism that persistently alters the maximal conductance of the hyperpolarization-activated current in a rhythmically active neuron.

Authors:  Edmund W Rodgers; Jing Jing Fu; Wulf-Dieter C Krenz; Deborah J Baro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Homeostatic regulation of h-conductance controls intrinsic excitability and stabilizes the threshold for synaptic modification in CA1 neurons.

Authors:  Célia Gasselin; Yanis Inglebert; Dominique Debanne
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Mechanisms of heterosynaptic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Sarah R Hulme; Owen D Jones; Clarke R Raymond; Pankaj Sah; Wickliffe C Abraham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Active dendrites mediate stratified gamma-range coincidence detection in hippocampal model neurons.

Authors:  Anindita Das; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Activation of InsP₃ receptors is sufficient for inducing graded intrinsic plasticity in rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Sufyan Ashhad; Daniel Johnston; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Degeneracy in the regulation of short-term plasticity and synaptic filtering by presynaptic mechanisms.

Authors:  Chinmayee L Mukunda; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Inactivating ion channels augment robustness of subthreshold intrinsic response dynamics to parametric variability in hippocampal model neurons.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar Rathour; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Quantitative interactions between the A-type K+ current and inositol trisphosphate receptors regulate intraneuronal Ca2+ waves and synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Sufyan Ashhad; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: interaction of theory with experiment.

Authors:  Leon N Cooper; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Purkinje cell intrinsic excitability increases after synaptic long term depression.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Fidel Santamaria
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.