Literature DB >> 18509078

A biophysical model of synaptic plasticity and metaplasticity can account for the dynamics of the backward shift of hippocampal place fields.

Xintian Yu1, Harel Z Shouval, James J Knierim.   

Abstract

Hippocampal place cells in the rat undergo experience-dependent changes when the rat runs stereotyped routes. One such change, the backward shift of the place field center of mass, has been linked by previous modeling efforts to spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). However, these models did not account for the termination of the place field shift and they were based on an abstract implementation of STDP that ignores many of the features found in cortical plasticity. Here, instead of the abstract STDP model, we use a calcium-dependent plasticity (CaDP) learning rule that can account for many of the observed properties of cortical plasticity. We use the CaDP learning rule in combination with a model of metaplasticity to simulate place field dynamics. Without any major changes to the parameters of the original model, the present simulations account both for the initial rapid place field shift and for the subsequent slowing down of this shift. These results suggest that the CaDP model captures the essence of a general cortical mechanism of synaptic plasticity, which may underlie numerous forms of synaptic plasticity observed both in vivo and in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509078      PMCID: PMC2525713          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01256.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields.

Authors:  M R Mehta; M C Quirk; M A Wilson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Activity coregulates quantal AMPA and NMDA currents at neocortical synapses.

Authors:  A J Watt; M C van Rossum; K M MacLeod; S B Nelson; G G Turrigiano
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A double dissociation between hippocampal subfields: differential time course of CA3 and CA1 place cells for processing changed environments.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Geeta Rao; James J Knierim
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Hippocampal plasticity across multiple days of exposure to novel environments.

Authors:  Loren M Frank; Garrett B Stanley; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Synaptic homeostasis and input selectivity follow from a calcium-dependent plasticity model.

Authors:  Luk Chong Yeung; Harel Z Shouval; Brian S Blais; Leon N Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The relationship between the field-shifting phenomenon and representational coherence of place cells in CA1 and CA3 in a cue-altered environment.

Authors:  Inah Lee; James J Knierim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 7.  Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  W C Abraham; M F Bear
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus.

Authors:  W B Levy; O Steward
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex.

Authors:  E L Bienenstock; L N Cooper; P W Munro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path.

Authors:  T V Bliss; T Lomo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  The h current is a candidate mechanism for regulating the sliding modification threshold in a BCM-like synaptic learning rule.

Authors:  Rishikesh Narayanan; Daniel Johnston
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Testing the nanoparticle-allostatic cross-adaptation-sensitization model for homeopathic remedy effects.

Authors:  Iris R Bell; Mary Koithan; Audrey J Brooks
Journal:  Homeopathy       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons Enable and Maintain Learning-Dependent Sequential Activation of Pyramidal Neurons.

Authors:  Avital Adler; Ruohe Zhao; Myung Eun Shin; Ryohei Yasuda; Wen-Biao Gan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  The spike-timing dependence of plasticity.

Authors:  Daniel E Feldman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Postsynaptic signal transduction models for long-term potentiation and depression.

Authors:  Tiina Manninen; Katri Hituri; Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski; Kim T Blackwell; Marja-Leena Linne
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Spike timing dependent plasticity: a consequence of more fundamental learning rules.

Authors:  Harel Z Shouval; Samuel S-H Wang; Gayle M Wittenberg
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Dominant role of adult neurogenesis-induced structural heterogeneities in driving plasticity heterogeneity in dentate gyrus granule cells.

Authors:  Sameera Shridhar; Poonam Mishra; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.753

8.  Presynaptic Spike Timing-Dependent Long-Term Depression in the Mouse Hippocampus.

Authors:  Yuniesky Andrade-Talavera; Paloma Duque-Feria; Ole Paulsen; Antonio Rodríguez-Moreno
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.