BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are associated with sensitivity to gefitinib or erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the relationships between the two most common types of somatic EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations, and clinical outcomes of Korean NSCLC patients after treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Korean patients with NSCLC, EGFR exon 19 deletions and EGFR L858R mutation were identified from tumor specimens obtained before treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. The response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with either an exon 19 deletion (n = 58) or L858R mutation (n = 19) were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. The overall response rate was 69%. Patients with an exon 19 deletion had a significantly longer PFS compared with patients with L858R mutation (9.5 vs. 7.7 months; P = 0.029). The L858R mutation was independently associated with a shorter PFS compared with an exon 19 deletion, even after adjusting for other clinical factors (hazard ratio 2.72; 95% CI 1.38-5.38). However, there were no significant differences in response rate (71 vs. 63%) and OS (21.4 vs. 30.7 months) between subjects with exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Korean NSCLC patients, EGFR exon 19 deletions are associated with longer PFS compared with EGFR L858R mutations. These observations need to be confirmed by large-scale studies of patients.
BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are associated with sensitivity to gefitinib or erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the relationships between the two most common types of somatic EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations, and clinical outcomes of Korean NSCLCpatients after treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Korean patients with NSCLC, EGFR exon 19 deletions and EGFRL858R mutation were identified from tumor specimens obtained before treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. The response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with either an exon 19 deletion (n = 58) or L858R mutation (n = 19) were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. The overall response rate was 69%. Patients with an exon 19 deletion had a significantly longer PFS compared with patients with L858R mutation (9.5 vs. 7.7 months; P = 0.029). The L858R mutation was independently associated with a shorter PFS compared with an exon 19 deletion, even after adjusting for other clinical factors (hazard ratio 2.72; 95% CI 1.38-5.38). However, there were no significant differences in response rate (71 vs. 63%) and OS (21.4 vs. 30.7 months) between subjects with exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Korean NSCLCpatients, EGFR exon 19 deletions are associated with longer PFS compared with EGFRL858R mutations. These observations need to be confirmed by large-scale studies of patients.
Authors: David M Jackman; Beow Y Yeap; Lecia V Sequist; Neal Lindeman; Alison J Holmes; Victoria A Joshi; Daphne W Bell; Mark S Huberman; Balazs Halmos; Michael S Rabin; Daniel A Haber; Thomas J Lynch; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C R Newton; A Graham; L E Heptinstall; S J Powell; C Summers; N Kalsheker; J C Smith; A F Markham Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 1989-04-11 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Duykhanh Pham; Allan R Li; Naiyer Rizvi; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Myung-Ju Ahn; Byeong-Bae Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Sang We Kim; Heung-Tae Kim; Jong Seog Lee; Jin Hyung Kang; Jae Yong Cho; Hong Suk Song; Se Hoon Park; Chang Hak Sohn; Sang Won Shin; Jin Hyuck Choi; Chang-Seok Ki; Chan Keum Park; Alison J Holmes; Pasi A Jänne; Keunchil Park Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sean Khozin; Gideon M Blumenthal; Xiaoping Jiang; Kun He; Karen Boyd; Anthony Murgo; Robert Justice; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-05-27
Authors: Luis Paz-Ares; Denis Soulières; Joachim Moecks; Ilze Bara; Tony Mok; Barbara Klughammer Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 5.310