BACKGROUND: Parent-report and child perception of familial support for weight-related behaviors may not be congruent. This research explores whether parent-report or child perception is more strongly associated with child-reported physical activity and television (TV) use. METHODS: Elementary school children (n = 73) participating in Ready. Set. ACTION!, a theater-based obesity prevention pilot program in Saint Paul, MN, and their parents completed surveys assessing familial support for physical activity and limitations on TV use in fall 2006. Paired t tests examined congruency between parent-report and child perception. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographics explored the associations between familial support and child-reported behavior. RESULTS: Levels of agreement between parent-report and child perception for support for physical activity and limitations on TV use were approximately 70%. Compared with parent-report for physical activity support, child perception was more strongly associated with child physical activity (beta = .17, P = .02). Neither parent-report nor child perception for support for limitations on TV use was associated with child TV use. DISCUSSION: Although parent-report and child perception of familial support for physical activity and to limit TV use were similar, child perception was more strongly associated with child physical activity behavior. More research, probably qualitative, is needed to examine how parents and children define and perceive parental support.
BACKGROUND: Parent-report and child perception of familial support for weight-related behaviors may not be congruent. This research explores whether parent-report or child perception is more strongly associated with child-reported physical activity and television (TV) use. METHODS: Elementary school children (n = 73) participating in Ready. Set. ACTION!, a theater-based obesity prevention pilot program in Saint Paul, MN, and their parents completed surveys assessing familial support for physical activity and limitations on TV use in fall 2006. Paired t tests examined congruency between parent-report and child perception. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographics explored the associations between familial support and child-reported behavior. RESULTS: Levels of agreement between parent-report and child perception for support for physical activity and limitations on TV use were approximately 70%. Compared with parent-report for physical activity support, child perception was more strongly associated with child physical activity (beta = .17, P = .02). Neither parent-report nor child perception for support for limitations on TV use was associated with child TV use. DISCUSSION: Although parent-report and child perception of familial support for physical activity and to limit TV use were similar, child perception was more strongly associated with child physical activity behavior. More research, probably qualitative, is needed to examine how parents and children define and perceive parental support.
Authors: Tom Baranowski; Janice Baranowski; Karen W Cullen; Carl deMoor; LaTroy Rittenberry; David Hebert; Lovell Jones Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Maureen T McGuire; Peter J Hannan; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Nicole H Falkner Cossrow; Mary Story Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Klazine Van Der Horst; Marijke J Chin A Paw; Jos W R Twisk; Willem Van Mechelen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Jess Haines; Ramona Robinson-O'Brien; Peter J Hannan; Michael Robins; Bonnie Morris; Christine A Petrich Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2008-07-11
Authors: Yan Wang; Erin R Hager; Laurence S Magder; Raquel Arbaiza; Samantha Wilkes; Maureen M Black Journal: Child Obes Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Emma Solomon-Moore; Joe Matthews; Thomas Reid; Zoi Toumpakari; Simon J Sebire; Janice L Thompson; Deborah A Lawlor; Russell Jago Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: L Uijtdewilligen; H E Brown; F Müller-Riemenschneider; Y W Lim; S Brage; E M van Sluijs Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Cornelia E Rebholz; Mai J M Chinapaw; Maartje M van Stralen; Elling Bere; Bettina Bringolf; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Nataša Jan; Eva Kovacs; Lea Maes; Yannis Manios; Luis Moreno; Amika S Singh; Johannes Brug; Saskia J te Velde Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 3.295