Literature DB >> 20551406

Association of corticosteroid dose and route of administration with risk of treatment failure in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Peter K Lindenauer1, Penelope S Pekow, Maureen C Lahti, Yoojin Lee, Evan M Benjamin, Michael B Rothberg.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Systemic corticosteroids are beneficial for patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, their optimal dose and route of administration are uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients treated with low doses of steroids administered orally to those treated with higher doses administered intravenously. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A pharmacoepidemiological cohort study conducted at 414 US hospitals involving patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD in 2006 and 2007 to a non-intensive care setting and who received systemic corticosteroids during the first 2 hospital days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A composite measure of treatment failure, defined as the initiation of mechanical ventilation after the second hospital day, inpatient mortality, or readmission for acute exacerbation of COPD within 30 days of discharge. Length of stay and hospital costs.
RESULTS: Of 79,985 patients, 73,765 (92%) were initially treated with intravenous steroids, whereas 6220 (8%) received oral treatment. We found that 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3%-1.5%) of the intravenously and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.2%) of the orally treated patients died during hospitalization, whereas 10.9% (95% CI, 10.7%-11.1%) of the intravenously and 10.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-11.0%) of the orally treated patients experienced the composite outcome. After multivariable adjustment, including the propensity for oral treatment, the risk of treatment failure among patients treated orally was not worse than for those treated intravenously (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02). In a propensity-matched analysis, the risk of treatment failure was significantly lower among orally treated patients (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95), as was length of stay and cost. Using an adaptation of the instrumental variable approach, increased rate of treatment with oral steroids was not associated with a change in the risk of treatment failure (OR for each 10% increase in hospital use of oral steroids, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03). A total of 1356 (22%) patients initially treated with oral steroids were switched to intravenous therapy later in the hospitalization.
CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD low-dose steroids administered orally are not associated with worse outcomes than high-dose intravenous therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551406     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  76 in total

1.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patterns of use of hemostatic agents in patients undergoing major surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Zainab Siddiq; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Utilization and safety of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier.

Authors:  Shazia Bashir; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for identifying patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations.

Authors:  Brian D Stein; Adriana Bautista; Glen T Schumock; Todd A Lee; Jeffery T Charbeneau; Diane S Lauderdale; Edward T Naureckas; David O Meltzer; Jerry A Krishnan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Khalid Hassan; Cande V Ananth; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Medication Regimens for Managing COPD Exacerbations.

Authors:  Nirupama Putcha; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 7.  Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.

Authors:  Dheeraj Gupta; Ritesh Agarwal; Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal; V N Maturu; Sahajal Dhooria; K T Prasad; Inderpaul S Sehgal; Lakshmikant B Yenge; Aditya Jindal; Navneet Singh; A G Ghoshal; G C Khilnani; J K Samaria; S N Gaur; D Behera
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-07

Review 9.  The pharmacological approach to the elderly COPD patient.

Authors:  Timothy E Albertson; Michael Schivo; Amir A Zeki; Samuel Louie; Mark E Sutter; Mark Avdalovic; Andrew L Chan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Predictors of Interventional Treatment Use for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lara Yoon; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Ling Chen; Jim C Hu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.