Literature DB >> 20551349

Minimum description length model selection of multinomial processing tree models.

Hao Wu1, Jay I Myung, William H Batchelder.   

Abstract

Multinomial processing tree (MPT) modeling has been widely and successfully applied as a statistical methodology for measuring hypothesized latent cognitive processes in selected experimental paradigms. In this article, we address the problem of selecting the best MPT model from a set of scientifically plausible MPT models, given observed data. We introduce a minimum description length (MDL) based model-selection approach that overcomes the limitations of existing methods such as the G(2)-based likelihood ratio test, the Akaike information criterion, and the Bayesian information criterion. To help ease the computational burden of implementing MDL, we provide a computer program in MATLAB that performs MDL-based model selection for any MPT model, with or without inequality constraints. Finally, we discuss applications of the MDL approach to well-studied MPT models with real data sets collected in two different experimental paradigms: source monitoring and pair clustering. The aforementioned MATLAB program may be downloaded from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551349     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  GPT.EXE: a powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models.

Authors:  X Hu; G A Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-05

2.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTION.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 4.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; In Jae Myung; Shaobo Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

6.  Cognitive psychometrics: assessing storage and retrieval deficits in special populations with multinomial processing tree models.

Authors:  David M Riefer; Bethany R Knapp; William H Batchelder; Donald Bamber; Victor Manifold
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2002-06

7.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

8.  Does response scaling cause the generalized context model to mimic a prototype model?

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

9.  A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.

Authors:  D M Riefer; W H Batchelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09

Review 10.  A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.

Authors:  R Schweickert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition: A discrete-state approach.

Authors:  Karl Christoph Klauer; David Kellen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 3.  Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes.

Authors:  Daniel W Heck; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  On the Minimum Description Length Complexity of Multinomial Processing Tree Models.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Jay I Myung; William H Batchelder
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Multinomial tree models for assessing the status of the reference in studies of the accuracy of tools for binary classification.

Authors:  Juan Botella; Huiling Huang; Manuel Suero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-03

6.  Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  Sieghard Beller; Henrik Singmann; Lisa Hüther; Andrea Bender
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.