Literature DB >> 7476247

A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.

D M Riefer1, W H Batchelder.   

Abstract

The recognition-failure paradigm has received much theoretical consideration, especially the Tulving-Wiseman function and its exceptions. We show that the Tulving-Wiseman function does a poor job of accounting for the data, both when its fit is measured with a model-based, goodness-of-fit statistic and when a logically equivalent reformulation of the function is compared with data. We then present a simple multinomial model based on retrieval-independence theory that is capable of measuring storage and retrieval processes in recognition failure. The model is used to conduct a meta-analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm, and shows that violations of the Tulving-Wiseman function occur under conditions in which weak storage is coupled with strong retrieval. In addition, if storage and retrieval are assumed to be positively correlated across conditions, the model produces a theoretically motivated, alternative equation to the Tulving-Wiseman function that provides a virtually identical fit to the data.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7476247     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Recognition failure of words with a single meaning.

Authors:  E Tulving; O C Watkins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-09

2.  Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM.

Authors:  J Metcalfe
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Recognition failures and free-recall failures: implications for the relation between recall and recognition.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

Review 4.  Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: an encoding variability hypothesis.

Authors:  E Martin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information.

Authors:  B B Murdock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.

Authors:  L G Nilsson; J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

7.  Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring.

Authors:  R A Kinchla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names in episodic and semantic memory tests.

Authors:  J H Neely; D G Payne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-03

9.  Memory storage and aging.

Authors:  D Schonfield; B A Robertson
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1966-06

10.  Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target.

Authors:  D J Bryant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Minimum description length model selection of multinomial processing tree models.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Jay I Myung; William H Batchelder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  Age differences in encoding and retrieving details of a pediatric examination.

Authors:  R H Bender; T S Wallsten; P A Ornstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

4.  Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.

Authors:  A Lian; A L Glass; R K Raanaas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

5.  On the Minimum Description Length Complexity of Multinomial Processing Tree Models.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Jay I Myung; William H Batchelder
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.