Literature DB >> 20550823

On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations.

Pedro Cardoso-Leite1, Andrei Gorea.   

Abstract

With its roots in Ungerleider and Mishkin's (1982) uncovering of two distinct - ventral and dorsal - anatomical pathways for the processing of visual information, and boosted by Goodale and Milner's (1992; Milner and Goodale, 1995) behavioral study of patients with lesions of either of these pathways, the perception-action dissociation became a standard reference in the sensorimotor literature. Here we present briefly the anatomical, neuropsychological and, more extensively, the psychophysical evidence favoring such dissociation and pit it against counteracting evidence as well as against potential methodological and conceptual pitfalls. We also discuss classes of models accounting for a number of 'dissociation' results and conclude that the most general and parsimonious one posits the existence of one single processing stream that accumulates information up to a decision criterion modulated by stimulation conditions, response mode (motor vs. verbal/perceptual), task constraints (speeded vs. free time responses) and the nature of the task (detection, discrimination, temporal order judgment, etc.). The reviewed evidence is not meant to refute or validate the hypothesis of a perceptual-motor dissociation. Rather, its main objective is to show that, beyond its self-evidence, such dissociation is difficult if not impossible to test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550823     DOI: 10.1163/187847510X503588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seeing Perceiving


  16 in total

1.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

2.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.

Authors:  Stefano Uccelli; Veronica Pisu; Lucia Riggio; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  More is not always better: adaptive gain control explains dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  Claudio Simoncini; Laurent U Perrinet; Anna Montagnini; Pascal Mamassian; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  How does the brain solve visual object recognition?

Authors:  James J DiCarlo; Davide Zoccolan; Nicole C Rust
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Acting without seeing: eye movements reveal visual processing without awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 7.  Decoupling speed and accuracy in an urgent decision-making task reveals multiple contributions to their trade-off.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Veronica E Scerra; Christopher K Hauser; M Gabriela Costello; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  A common representation of spatial features drives action and perception: grasping and judging object features within trials.

Authors:  Jens H Christiansen; Jeppe Christensen; Thor Grünbaum; Søren Kyllingsbæk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution.

Authors:  Israel Abramov; James Gordon; Olga Feldman; Alla Chavarga
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measure.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.