Literature DB >> 20550601

Bacterial growth kinetic without the influence of the immune system using vacuum-assisted closure dressing with and without negative pressure in an in vitro wound model.

Ojan Assadian1, Afshin Assadian, Maria Stadler, Magda Diab-Elschahawi, Axel Kramer.   

Abstract

The physical capacity of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing on the bacterial growth in an in vitro wound model was investigated. Standardised wounds were contaminated with a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain and incubated at 35 degrees C for 6 hours. Four wounds were treated with continuous negative pressure (125 mmHg) and four controls without. Bacterial load per gram tissue and per gram polyurethane sponge were measured after 24, 36 and 72 hours. Without negative pressure, the initial mean S. aureus load per gram tissue was 1.42 x 10(4), with negative pressure 1.84 x 10(4), P = 0.294. After 24, 36 and 72 hours, both models yielded comparable numbers of organisms (24 hours: P = 0.081; 48 hours: P = 0.455; 72 hours: P = 0.825, respectively). Bacterial load of sponges with or without negative pressure also did not differ. Over a period of 72 hours, sponges with negative pressure yielded 1.60 x 10(8), those without negative pressure yielded 1.74 x 10(8) CFU/g sponge (P = 0.876). In non vital tissue without the influence of the immune system, the bacterial load did not decrease in our in vitro model using an NPWT dressing. This observation was independent of the physical effect of continuous negative pressure at 125 mmHg. The reduction in bacteria demonstrated in previous studies appears to be caused by other effects than physical suction alone. However, the results obtained are limited as non viable tissue was used and the effect of suction on dead tissue might be very different from that occurring on perfused tissue, for example, in an animal model or in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550601      PMCID: PMC7951651          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00686.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  26 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  A J Singer; R A Clark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig.

Authors:  G D WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.

Authors:  J N Matthews; D G Altman; M J Campbell; P Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-27

5.  [V.A.C.-treatment: a new approach to the management of septic complications in thoracic surgery].

Authors:  V Matzi; J Lindenmann; C Porubsky; D Mujkic; A Maier; F M Smolle-Jüttner
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  Definition of infection in chronic wounds by Dutch nursing home physicians.

Authors:  A A L M Rondas; J M G A Schols; E E Stobberingh; P E Price
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  [Vacuum assisted closure for the treatment of sternal wound infections -- rapid infection control and bridging to reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  I Kutschka; S Dziadzka; A El Essawi; P-J Flory; W Harringer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  The prevalence, management and outcome for acute wounds identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district.

Authors:  Kathryn R Vowden; Peter Vowden
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.932

10.  The vacuum-assisted closure system for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Tatjana M Fleck; Michael Fleck; Reinhard Moidl; Martin Czerny; Rupert Koller; Pietro Giovanoli; Michael J Hiesmayer; Daniel Zimpfer; Ernst Wolner; Martin Grabenwoger
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  15 in total

1.  Role of different negative pressure values in the process of infected wounds treated by vacuum-assisted closure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Aixi Yu; Gang Wu; Chengyan Xia; Xiang Hu; Baiwen Qi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Acute otitis externa because of negative pressure wound therapy applied over the head and ear canal for scalping treatment.

Authors:  Júlio C D Castro; Pedro S Coltro; João L G Jorge; Jayme A Farina Junior
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy in acute, contaminated wounds: documenting its safety and efficacy to support current global practice.

Authors:  Ehyal Shweiki; Kathy E Gallagher
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Comparison of tissue damage, cleansing and cross-contamination potential during wound cleansing via two methods: lavage and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

Authors:  Diwi Allen; Lori A LaBarbera; Ioana L Bondre; M Christian Lessing; Anthony M Rycerz; Deepak V Kilpadi; Barbara A Collins; Joanna Perkins; Amy K McNulty
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Impact of negative-pressure wound therapy on bacterial behaviour and bioburden in a contaminated full-thickness wound.

Authors:  Zhirui Li; Qingwen Yu; Song Wang; Guoqi Wang; Tongtong Li; Pei-Fu Tang; Daohong Liu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Retained Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Foams as a Cause of Infection Persistence.

Authors:  Konstantinos Anagnostakos; Andreas Thiery; Ismail Sahan
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Active drain system with reticulated open-pore foam-surface dressing for postoperative pancreatic fistula in a rat model.

Authors:  Yang Li; Ying Sun; Zhiqiang Liu; Yongfeng Li; Shanmiao Gou
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  Bacterial growth kinetics under a novel flexible methacrylate dressing serving as a drug delivery vehicle for antiseptics.

Authors:  Christina Forstner; Johannes Leitgeb; Rupert Schuster; Verena Dosch; Axel Kramer; Keith F Cutting; David J Leaper; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Can post-sternotomy mediastinitis be prevented by a closed incision management system?

Authors:  Pascal M Dohmen; Thanasie Markou; Richard Ingemansson; Heinrich Rotering; Jean M Hartman; René van Valen; Maaike Brunott; Axel Kramer; Patrique Segers
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Early application of negative pressure wound therapy to acute wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus: An effective approach to preventing biofilm formation.

Authors:  Tongtong Li; Lihai Zhang; L I Han; Guoqi Wang; Peng Yin; Zhirui Li; Licheng Zhang; Q I Guo; Daohong Liu; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.