BACKGROUND: The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of 'Inside View'. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. METHODS: 'Inside View' was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. FINDINGS: Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.
BACKGROUND: The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of 'Inside View'. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. METHODS: 'Inside View' was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. FINDINGS: Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.
Authors: Maria Stuttaford; Claudette Bryanston; Gillian Lewando Hundt; Myles Connor; Margaret Thorogood; Stephen Tollman Journal: Health (London) Date: 2006-01
Authors: Bob Heyman; Gillian Hundt; Jane Sandall; Kevin Spencer; Clare Williams; Rachel Grellier; Laura Pitson Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-11-14 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Ross Gray; Chris Sinding; Vrenia Ivonoffski; Margaret Fitch; Ann Hampson; Marlene Greenberg Journal: Health Expect Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Bethany M Kwan; Ross C Brownson; Russell E Glasgow; Elaine H Morrato; Douglas A Luke Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Alice Corsaro; Andrea Poscia; Chiara de Waure; Concetta De Meo; Filippo Berloco; Walter Ricciardi; Gianfranco Damiani; Patrizia Laurenti; Collaborating Group Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2017-09-24