Literature DB >> 20550590

A study of patient expectations in a Norfolk general practice.

Charlotte Kenten1, Ann Bowling, Nigel Lambert, Amanda Howe, Gene Rowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use semi-structured interviews to ascertain patterns in patients' expectations of health care and the extent to which these expectations were met or not.
BACKGROUND: In health policy it is important to evaluate health services from varying perspectives including consumers'. One concept of emerging importance in this regard is that of patient expectations. Whether expectations are met or not have been found to be related to general patient satisfaction with treatment and treatment compliance. However, there is conceptual and methodological uncertainty and little informing empirical work regarding what is an 'expectation' and how it should be measured.
DESIGN: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to elicit 20 GP patients' expectations prior to their consultation. A post consultation interview gauged the extent to which these expectations had been met. SETTING AND PARTICIPANT: Twenty patients of a GP practice in Norfolk (UK).
RESULTS: Results suggest several different expectations, concerned with the doctor-patient interaction, the specific processes of the consultation, outcomes, and issues to do with time and space.
CONCLUSIONS: This research has used an innovative exploratory approach to address the expectations of GP patients and has implications for how doctors ought to manage their consultations. These results will be used to inform the development of a quantitative expectations questionnaire so as to develop a validated measure of expectations. Such an instrument has great potential to aid in health care research and practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550590      PMCID: PMC5060535          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  28 in total

1.  Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?

Authors:  George K Freeman; Frede Olesen; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R Crow; H Gage; S Hampson; J Hart; A Kimber; L Storey; H Thomas
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Assessing patients' preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method.

Authors:  Gene Rowe; Nigel Lambert; Ann Bowling; Shah Ebrahim; Ian Wakeling; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence.

Authors:  A G Thompson; R Suñol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters.

Authors:  J E Ware; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  [Patient expectations regarding methods and outcomes of their rehabilitation--a controlled study of back pain- and cancer patients].

Authors:  H Faller; H Vogel; B Bosch
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.113

8.  The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists.

Authors:  A Bowling; J Redfern
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Patient expectation is a strong predictor of severe nausea after chemotherapy: a University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program study of patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph A Roscoe; Peter Bushunow; Gary R Morrow; Jane T Hickok; Philip J Kuebler; Andrew Jacobs; Tarit K Banerjee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Toward a theory of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  S U Linder-Pelz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  6 in total

1.  What Do Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain Expect from Their Physiotherapist?

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Kathy Simmons; Mike Kay; Tony G J Ingram; Jeannette Byrne; Jenna M Roddick; Alissa Setliff; Amanda M Hall
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  What do people appreciate in physicians' communication? An international study with focus groups using videotaped medical consultations.

Authors:  Maria A Mazzi; Michela Rimondini; Myriam Deveugele; Christa Zimmermann; Francesca Moretti; Liesbeth van Vliet; Giuseppe Deledda; Ian Fletcher; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Camilla Aakjær Andersen; John Brodersen; Torsten Rahbek Rudbæk; Martin Bach Jensen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Representations of influenza and influenza-like illness in the community--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christine Cedraschi; Laurence Saya; Patrick Klein; Marie-France Bordet; Fabrice Carrat
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Managing clients' expectations at the outset of online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for depression.

Authors:  Stuart Ekberg; Rebecca K Barnes; David S Kessler; Alice Malpass; Alison R G Shaw
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  What do consumers with chronic conditions expect from their interactions with general practitioners? A qualitative study of Australian consumer and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Song; Sarah Dennis; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Mark Fort Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.