Literature DB >> 20547536

Age-related differences in gaze following: does the age of the face matter?

Gillian Slessor1, Gillian Laird, Louise H Phillips, Rebecca Bull, Dimitra Filippou.   

Abstract

Previous research revealed age differences in following the gaze of others. To date, however, investigations have concentrated on only young faces as target stimuli. The present study explored whether varying the age of target stimuli moderated gaze following in younger and older adults. Overall, older participants showed less evidence of gaze following, but this was qualified by the age of the face viewed. Younger participants showed an own-age bias, following the gaze cues of stimuli depicting those in their own age range to a greater extent than stimuli depicting older adults. However, a similar own-age effect was not found for older participants. These findings suggest that age differences in gaze following may be driven by younger participants having an advantage for processing the gaze cues from the faces of younger adults, highlighting the importance of varying the age of the target stimuli when assessing age differences in some aspects of social perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20547536     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbq038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Continued Eclipse of Heterogeneity in Gerontological Research.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Stone; Jielu Lin; Dale Dannefer; Jessica A Kelley-Moore
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Authors:  Nora D Gayzur; Linda K Langley; Chris Kelland; Sara V Wyman; Alyson L Saville; Annie T Ciernia; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparing social attention in autism and amygdala lesions: effects of stimulus and task condition.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Moran Cerf; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Sex, skull length, breed, and age predict how dogs look at faces of humans and conspecifics.

Authors:  Zsófia Bognár; Ivaylo B Iotchev; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.

Authors:  Eunice G Fernandes; Louise H Phillips; Gillian Slessor; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes.

Authors:  Paola Del Sette; Markus Bindemann; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Face age modulates gaze following in young adults.

Authors:  Francesca Ciardo; Barbara F M Marino; Rossana Actis-Grosso; Angela Rossetti; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gaze Behavior Consistency among Older and Younger Adults When Looking at Emotional Faces.

Authors:  Laurence Chaby; Isabelle Hupont; Marie Avril; Viviane Luherne-du Boullay; Mohamed Chetouani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-13

10.  Training for eye contact modulates gaze following in dogs.

Authors:  Lisa J Wallis; Friederike Range; Corsin A Müller; Samuel Serisier; Ludwig Huber; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.