Literature DB >> 20545422

The effects of aging on the speed-accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model.

Jeffrey J Starns1, Roger Ratcliff.   

Abstract

We evaluated age-related differences in the optimality of decision boundary settings in a diffusion model analysis. In the model, the width of the decision boundary represents the amount of evidence that must accumulate in favor of a response alternative before a decision is made. Wide boundaries lead to slow but accurate responding, and narrow boundaries lead to fast but inaccurate responding. There is a single value of boundary separation that produces the most correct answers in a given period of time, and we refer to this value as the reward rate optimal boundary (RROB). We consistently found across a variety of decision tasks that older adults used boundaries that were much wider than the RROB value. Young adults used boundaries that were closer to the RROB value, although age differences in optimality were smaller with instructions emphasizing speed than with instructions emphasizing accuracy. Young adults adjusted their boundary settings to more closely approach the RROB value when they were provided with accuracy feedback and extensive practice. Older participants showed no evidence of making boundary adjustments in response to feedback or task practice, and they consistently used boundary separation values that produced accuracy levels that were near asymptote. Our results suggest that young adults attempt to balance speed and accuracy to achieve the most correct answers per unit time, whereas older adultts attempt to minimize errors even if they must respond quite slowly to do so. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20545422      PMCID: PMC2896207          DOI: 10.1037/a0018022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  30 in total

1.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; T Van Zandt; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Application of the diffusion model to two-choice tasks for adults 75-90 years old.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-03

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  A diffusion model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  Julia Spaniol; David J Madden; Andreas Voss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Moderation of older adults' retrieval reluctance through task instructions and monetary incentives.

Authors:  Dayna R Touron; Elizabeth T Swaim; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Aging and emotional memory: cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect.

Authors:  Julia Spaniol; Andreas Voss; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

9.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

10.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; David Contreras; Cara Buck; Peter Hu; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  99 in total

1.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Children are not like older adults: a diffusion model analysis of developmental changes in speeded responses.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jessica Love; Clarissa A Thompson; John E Opfer
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-12-21

3.  An optimal adjustment procedure to minimize experiment time in decisions with multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Guy E Hawkins; Scott D Brown; Mark Steyvers; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

4.  Age-related differences in diffusion model boundary optimality with both trial-limited and time-limited tasks.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

5.  A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 6.  A four-component model of age-related memory change.

Authors:  M Karl Healey; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Irrational time allocation in decision-making.

Authors:  Bastiaan Oud; Ian Krajbich; Kevin Miller; Jin Hyun Cheong; Matthew Botvinick; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.

Authors:  Nadja R Ging-Jehli; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-07-27

9.  Aging and confidence judgments in item recognition.

Authors:  Chelsea Voskuilen; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.