Literature DB >> 19140656

Aging and emotional memory: cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect.

Julia Spaniol1, Andreas Voss, Cheryl L Grady.   

Abstract

Younger adults tend to remember negative information better than positive or neutral information (negativity bias). The negativity bias is reduced in aging, with older adults occasionally exhibiting superior memory for positive, as opposed to negative or neutral, information (positivity bias). Two experiments with younger (N=24 in Experiment 1, N=25 in Experiment 2; age range: 18-35 years) and older adults (N=24 in both experiments; age range: 60-85 years) investigated the cognitive mechanisms responsible for age-related differences in recognition memory for emotional information. Results from diffusion model analyses (R. Ratcliff, 1978) indicated that the effects of valence on response bias were similar in both age groups but that Age x Valence interactions emerged in memory retrieval. Specifically, older adults experienced greater overall familiarity for positive items than younger adults. We interpret this finding in terms of an age-related increase in the accessibility of positive information in long-term memory. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19140656     DOI: 10.1037/a0014218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  37 in total

1.  Age differences in default and reward networks during processing of personally relevant information.

Authors:  Cheryl L Grady; Omer Grigg; Charisa Ng
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Differential hemodynamic response in affective circuitry with aging: an FMRI study of novelty, valence, and arousal.

Authors:  Yoshiya Moriguchi; Alyson Negreira; Mariann Weierich; Rebecca Dautoff; Bradford C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does Looking at the Positive Mean Feeling Good? Age and Individual Differences Matter.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; Soo Rim Noh
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2011-08-01

4.  Perceptual salience does not influence emotional arousal's impairing effects on top-down attention.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Douglas A McQuiggan; Jennifer D Ryan; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-01-12

5.  Valence-based age differences in medial prefrontal activity during impression formation.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Eric D Leshikar; Joanne Y Shih; Avigael Aizenman; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 6.  Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood.

Authors:  Susan Turk Charles
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Emotional aging: recent findings and future trends.

Authors:  Susanne Scheibe; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Emerging perspectives in social neuroscience and neuroeconomics of aging.

Authors:  Lisbeth Nielsen; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Becoming a better person: temporal remoteness biases autobiographical memories for moral events.

Authors:  Jessica R Escobedo; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-08

10.  Familiar smiling faces in Alzheimer's disease: understanding the positivity-related recognition bias.

Authors:  Katja Werheid; Rebecca S McDonald; Nicholas Simmons-Stern; Brandon A Ally; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.