Literature DB >> 20544259

Accommodation limits induced optical defocus in defocus experiments.

Herbert Jägle1, Ditta Zobor, Thomas Brauns.   

Abstract

A common method to induce optical defocus is by means of positive lenses. However, accommodation, pupil size, and depth of focus are important factors determining the amount of defocus achieved. We therefore studied the effect of accommodation on visual acuity with a natural pupil (miosis) and in cycloplegic mydriasis. Additionally, we looked at the amount of accommodation and pupil size fluctuation during the recording of a mfVEP. We found that the amount of defocus induced with lenses of positive power is limited in non-mydriatic experiments by accommodation and actual pupil size and may show marked variation during mfVEP recording. We therefore recommend using a mydriatic drug and, if required, an artificial pupil for defocus experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20544259     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9237-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction.

Authors:  Anne Seidemann; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Depth of focus of the human eye.

Authors:  K N OGLE; J T SCHWARTZ
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1959-03

3.  The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Christina Pieh; Michael B Hoffmann; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity.

Authors:  M Bach
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Measurement of astigmatism by automated infrared photoretinoscopy.

Authors:  F Gekeler; F Schaeffel; H C Howland; J Wattam-Bell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).

Authors:  M Choi; S Weiss; F Schaeffel; A Seidemann; H C Howland; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Blur-induced changes in the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  M S Berman; S Seki
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-07

8.  Tolerance to visual defocus.

Authors:  G E Legge; K T Mullen; G C Woo; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of diffusing filters for artificially reducing visual acuity when testing equipment and procedures.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Isabell Strübin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.

Authors:  Michael B Hoffmann; Jan Brands; Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.