Literature DB >> 20541896

Determinants of patient-family caregiver congruence on preferred place of death in taiwan.

Siew Tzuh Tang1, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen, Woung-Ru Tang, Tsang-Wu Liu.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patient-family caregiver congruence on preferred place of death not only increases the likelihood of dying at home but also contributes significantly to terminally ill cancer patients' quality of life.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the determinants of patient-family caregiver congruence on the preferred place of death in Taiwan.
METHODS: Patient-family caregiver dyads (n=1,108) were surveyed on preferences and needs for end-of-life (EOL) care. Determinants of congruence on preferences were identified by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Patient-caregiver dyads achieved 78.1% agreement on the preferred place of death. The kappa coefficient of congruence was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.50, 0.60). The extent of patient-family caregiver congruence on preferred place of death increased with the patient's higher functional dependence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] and 95% CI=1.04 [1.02, 1.05]), higher patient-rated importance for dying at preferred place of death (AOR [95% CI]=1.60 [1.43, 1.79]), and having a spousal caregiver (AOR [95% CI]=1.62 [1.14, 2.31]). Other determinants of patient-family caregiver congruence included patient age (AOR [95% CI]=1.01 [1.00, 1.03]), patient-family concordance on preferred EOL care options (AOR=1.68-1.73), patient knowledge of prognosis (AOR [95% CI]=0.68 [0.48, 0.97]), and impact of caregiving on the family caregiver's life (AOR [95% CI]=0.98 [0.96, 0.99]).
CONCLUSION: Increasing patient-family congruence on preferred place of death not only requires knowledge of the patient's prognosis and advance planning by both parties but also depends on family caregivers endorsing patient preferences for EOL care options and ensuring that supporting patients dying at home does not create an intolerable burden for family caregivers. Copyright (c) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541896     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  4 in total

1.  Consistency in End-of-Life Care Preferences Between Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Primary Family Caregivers.

Authors:  I-Fei Chuang; Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu; Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Preference of the place of death among people of pune.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Kulkarni; Pradeep Kulkarni; Vrushali Anavkar; Ravindra Ghooi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-05

3.  Preference of the place of death.

Authors:  SimSai Tin; Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

4.  Assessment of changes in place of death of older adults who died from dementia in the United States, 2000-2014: a time-series cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Changshan Wu; Jason Fletcher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.