Literature DB >> 20541892

High preoperative range of motion is a significant risk factor for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Brian A Krenzel1, Michael E Berend, Robert A Malinzak, Philip M Faris, E Michael Keating, John B Meding, Merrill A Ritter.   

Abstract

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is multifactorial and is dependent on surgical, implant, and patient factors. We hypothesized that high preoperative hip range of motion is an important variable contributing to instability after THA. We retrospectively reviewed 3379 THAs performed during a 21-year period. Average follow-up was 6.6 years. We examined the effect of surgical approach, femoral head size, and preoperative range of motion on dislocation rates. Patients with a posterior approach and 115 degrees or greater of combined preoperative flexion, adduction, and internal rotation dislocated at a significantly higher frequency than those with less than 115 degrees of combined motion (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .007). High preoperative motion in conjunction with a posterior approach and femoral head size less than 32 mm had the highest dislocation rate in our sample (5.9%). Preoperative range of motion is an important variable that should be taken into consideration during operative planning to help reduce the risk of dislocation. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541892     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

2.  Acetabular and Femoral Component Positioning Using Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Souvik Paul; Tushar Gupta; Lakshmana Das
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A Specific Capsular Repair Technique Lowered Early Dislocations in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Posterior Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Hernandez; John R Steele; Christine J Wu; Daniel J Cunningham; Gerald K Aggrey; Michael P Bolognesi; Samuel S Wellman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Bruno Miletic; Anthony Deny; Henri Migaud; Nicolas Fouilleron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Low early and late dislocation rates with 36- and 40-mm heads in patients at high risk for dislocation.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Anterior hip replacement: lower dislocation rates despite less restrictions?

Authors:  Anna Jungwirth-Weinberger; Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Kilian Rueckl; Bernhard Springer; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  No benefit on functional outcomes and dislocation rates by increasing head size to 36 mm in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yu-Der Lu; Shih-Hsiang Yen; Feng-Chih Kuo; Jun-Wen Wang; Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Plain radiography findings to predict dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Xiaoguang Cheng; Dong Yan; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.