Literature DB >> 20541763

Individual-specific muscle maximum force estimation using ultrasound for ankle joint torque prediction using an EMG-driven Hill-type model.

Liliam Fernandes de Oliveira1, Luciano Luporini Menegaldo.   

Abstract

EMG-driven models can be used to estimate muscle force in biomechanical systems. Collected and processed EMG readings are used as the input of a dynamic system, which is integrated numerically. This approach requires the definition of a reasonably large set of parameters. Some of these vary widely among subjects, and slight inaccuracies in such parameters can lead to large model output errors. One of these parameters is the maximum voluntary contraction force (F(om)). This paper proposes an approach to find F(om) by estimating muscle physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) using ultrasound (US), which is multiplied by a realistic value of maximum muscle specific tension. Ultrasound is used to measure muscle thickness, which allows for the determination of muscle volume through regression equations. Soleus, gastrocnemius medialis and gastrocnemius lateralis PCSAs are estimated using published volume proportions among leg muscles, which also requires measurements of muscle fiber length and pennation angle by US. F(om) obtained by this approach and from data widely cited in the literature was used to comparatively test a Hill-type EMG-driven model of the ankle joint. The model uses 3 EMGs (Soleus, gastrocnemius medialis and gastrocnemius lateralis) as inputs with joint torque as the output. The EMG signals were obtained in a series of experiments carried out with 8 adult male subjects, who performed an isometric contraction protocol consisting of 10s step contractions at 20% and 60% of the maximum voluntary contraction level. Isometric torque was simultaneously collected using a dynamometer. A statistically significant reduction in the root mean square error was observed when US-obtained F(om) was used, as compared to F(om) from the literature.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541763     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Relationship between isometric contraction intensity and muscle hardness assessed by ultrasound strain elastography.

Authors:  Takayuki Inami; Toru Tsujimura; Takuya Shimizu; Takemasa Watanabe; Wing Yin Lau; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A preliminary study on the differences in male and female muscle force distribution patterns during squatting and lunging maneuvers.

Authors:  Rena Hale; Jerome G Hausselle; Roger V Gonzalez
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Tibialis anterior analysis from functional and architectural perspective during isometric foot dorsiflexion: a cross-sectional study of repeated measures.

Authors:  Maria Ruiz Muñoz; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Relationship of moderate and low isometric lumbar extension through architectural and muscular activity variables: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  A diffusion tensor-based method facilitating volumetric assessment of fiber orientations in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Laura Secondulfo; Melissa T Hooijmans; Joep J Suskens; Valentina Mazzoli; Mario Maas; Johannes L Tol; Aart J Nederveen; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Importance and challenges of measuring intrinsic foot muscle strength.

Authors:  Achini Soysa; Claire Hiller; Kathryn Refshauge; Joshua Burns
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  EMGD-FE: an open source graphical user interface for estimating isometric muscle forces in the lower limb using an EMG-driven model.

Authors:  Luciano Luporini Menegaldo; Liliam Fernandes de Oliveira; Kin K Minato
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.