Literature DB >> 28290056

Relationship between isometric contraction intensity and muscle hardness assessed by ultrasound strain elastography.

Takayuki Inami1,2, Toru Tsujimura3, Takuya Shimizu4, Takemasa Watanabe4, Wing Yin Lau1, Kazunori Nosaka5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound elastography is used to assess muscle hardness or stiffness; however, no previous studies have validated muscle hardness measures using ultrasound strain elastography (SE). This study investigated the relationship between plantar flexor isometric contraction intensity and gastrocnemius hardness assessed by SE. We hypothesised that the muscle would become harder linearly with an increase in the contraction intensity of the plantar flexors.
METHODS: Fifteen young women (20.1 ± 0.8 years) performed isometric contractions of the ankle plantar flexors at four different intensities (25, 50, 75, 100% of maximal voluntary contraction force: MVC) at 0° plantar flexion. Using SE images, the strain ratio (SR) between the muscle and an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus 22.6 kPa) placed over the skin was calculated (muscle/coupler); pennation angle and muscle thickness were measured for the resting and contracting conditions.
RESULTS: SR decreased with increasing contraction intensity from rest (1.28 ± 0.20) to 25% (0.99 ± 0.21), 50% (0.61 ± 0.15), 75% (0.34 ± 0.1) and 100% MVC (0.20 ± 0.05). SR decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with increasing MVC from rest to 75% MVC, but levelled off from 75 and 100% MVC. SR was negatively correlated with pennation angle (r = -0.80, P < 0.01) and muscle thickness ( r= -0.78,  P< 0.01).
CONCLUSION: SR appears to represent muscle hardness changes in response to contraction intensity changes, in the assumption that the gastrocnemius muscle contraction intensity is proportional to the plantar flexion intensity. We concluded that gastrocnemius muscle hardness changes could be validly assessed by SR, and the force-hardness relationship was not linear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrocnemius; Muscle force; Muscle thickness; Pennation angle; Strain ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28290056     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3528-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Muscle shear elastic modulus measured using supersonic shear imaging is highly related to muscle activity level.

Authors:  Antoine Nordez; François Hug
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-02-18

2.  Ultrasound elastography: the new frontier in direct measurement of muscle stiffness.

Authors:  Joline E Brandenburg; Sarah F Eby; Pengfei Song; Heng Zhao; Jeffrey S Brault; Shigao Chen; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Myometry revealed medication-induced decrease in resting skeletal muscle stiffness in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Jarosław Marusiak; Anna Jaskólska; Magdalena Koszewicz; Sławomir Budrewicz; Artur Jaskólski
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Quantitative analysis of muscle hardness in tetanic contractions induced by electrical stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Makoto Morisada; Kaoru Okada; Kenji Kawakita
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Human muscle hardness assessment during incremental isometric contraction using transient elastography.

Authors:  Jean Luc Gennisson; Christophe Cornu; Stefan Catheline; Mathias Fink; Pierre Portero
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  L E Ford; A F Huxley; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Characterization of passive elastic properties of the human medial gastrocnemius muscle belly using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Olivier Maïsetti; François Hug; Killian Bouillard; Antoine Nordez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Evaluation of human muscle hardness after dynamic exercise with ultrasound real-time tissue elastography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  O Yanagisawa; M Niitsu; T Kurihara; T Fukubayashi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Muscle hardness in patients with chronic tension-type headache: relation to actual headache state.

Authors:  M Ashina; L Bendtsen; R Jensen; F Sakai; J Olesen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Repeated contractions alter the geometry of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Constantinos N Maganaris; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Anthony J Sargeant
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-08-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Determination of the Relationships Between intra- and Extraoral Tongue Hardness, Thickness, and Pressure Using Ultrasonic Elastography.

Authors:  Keina Miura; Mai Ohkubo; Tetsuya Sugiyama; Masahito Tsuiki; Ryo Ishida
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Microdialysis and ultrasound elastography for monitoring of localized muscular reaction after pharmacological stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Stephan Johannsen; Martin Schick; Norbert Roewer; Frank Schuster
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-09-03

3.  Reliability of Trapezius Muscle Hardness Measurement: A Comparison between Portable Muscle Hardness Meter and Ultrasound Strain Elastography.

Authors:  Tomonori Sawada; Hiroki Okawara; Daisuke Nakashima; Shuhei Iwabuchi; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Effects of Knee Joint Angle and Contraction Intensity on the Triceps Surae Stiffness.

Authors:  Ming Lin; Weixin Deng; Hongying Liang; Suiqing Yu; Qin Xu; Chunlong Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-22

5.  Changes in the Linear Relationship between Muscle Contraction Intensity and Muscle Hardness after Rectus Femoris Muscle Strain.

Authors:  Takayuki Inami; Takuya Shimizu; Tomoaki Osuga; Takaya Narita; Norikazu Hirose; Mitsuyoshi Murayama
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.