Literature DB >> 20541746

Enteral nutrition access devices.

Richard S Kwon, Subhas Banerjee, David Desilets, David L Diehl, Francis A Farraye, Vivek Kaul, Petar Mamula, Marcos C Pedrosa, Sarah A Rodriguez, Shyam Varadarajulu, Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song, William M Tierney.   

Abstract

The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but, in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such situations, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the ASGE Governing Board. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2009 for articles related to endoscopy in patients requiring enteral feeding access by using the keywords "endoscopy," "percutaneous," "gastrostomy," "jejunostomy," "nasogastric," "nasoenteric," "nasojejunal," "transnasal," "feeding tube," "enteric," and "button." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541746     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  26 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy-guided jejunal extension tube placement through existing gastrostomy tubes: analysis of 391 procedures.

Authors:  Andre Uflacker; Yujie Qiao; Genevieve Easley; James Patrie; Drew Lambert; Eduard E de Lange
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Palliative percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement for gastrointestinal cancer: Roles, goals, and complications.

Authors:  Matthew Mobily; Jitesh A Patel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 3.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Practice variation in PEG tube placement: trends and predictors among providers in the United States.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Michelle Nazareth; Justin L Sewell; J Lucas Williams; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Application of bronchoscope for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tube in patients with esophagectomy: a novel technique.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Cao; Wei Zhang; Jun Zhang; Xiong-Huai Hua; Jian-Jun Qin; Yin Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in esophageal cancer patients: a feasible and safe access for nutritional support during multimodal therapy.

Authors:  Williams Tessier; Guillaume Piessen; Nicolas Briez; Arianna Boschetto; Géraldine Sergent; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement: A simple procedure?

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-16

8.  Randomized clinical trial: nasoenteric tube or jejunostomy as a route for nutrition after major upper gastrointestinal operations.

Authors:  Luiz Gonzaga Torres Júnior; Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos Santos; Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Safety of pull-type and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in oncology patients: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Evi Van Dyck; Elisabeth J Macken; Bernard Roth; Paul A Pelckmans; Tom G Moreels
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: predictors of 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.

Authors:  David M Richards; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Gaurav Arora; Sushovan Guha; Alexander A Dekovich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.