Literature DB >> 20541411

The function of bilateral odor arrival time differences in olfactory orientation of sharks.

Jayne M Gardiner1, Jelle Atema.   

Abstract

The direction of an odor signal source can be estimated from bilateral differences in signal intensity and/or arrival time. The best-known examples of the use of arrival time differences are in acoustic orientation. For chemoreception, animals are believed to orient by comparing bilateral odor concentration differences, turning toward higher concentrations. However, time differences should not be ignored, because odor plumes show chaotic intermittency, with the concentration variance several orders of magnitude greater than the concentration mean. We presented a small shark species, Mustelus canis, with carefully timed and measured odor pulses directly into their nares. They turned toward the side stimulated first, even with delayed pulses of higher concentration. This is the first conclusive evidence that under seminatural conditions and without training, bilateral time differences trump odor concentration differences. This response would steer the shark into an odor patch each time and thereby enhance its contact with the plume, i.e., a stream of patches. Animals with more widely spaced nares would be able to resolve smaller angles of attack at higher swimming speeds, a feature that may have contributed to the evolution of hammerhead sharks. This constitutes a novel steering algorithm for tracking odor plumes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541411     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  30 in total

1.  Signaling by sensory receptors.

Authors:  David Julius; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  From chemotaxis to the cognitive map: the function of olfaction.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Specializations of a pheromonal glomerulus in the Drosophila olfactory system.

Authors:  Gautam Agarwal; Ehud Isacoff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Integrating temperature with odor processing in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Eugen Kludt; Camille Okom; Alexander Brinkmann; Detlev Schild
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Intermittency coding in the primary olfactory system: a neural substrate for olfactory scene analysis.

Authors:  Il Memming Park; Yuriy V Bobkov; Barry W Ache; José C Príncipe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Natural search algorithms as a bridge between organisms, evolution, and ecology.

Authors:  Andrew M Hein; Francesco Carrara; Douglas R Brumley; Roman Stocker; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The computational worm: spatial orientation and its neuronal basis in C. elegans.

Authors:  Shawn R Lockery
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Humans navigate with stereo olfaction.

Authors:  Yuli Wu; Kepu Chen; Yuting Ye; Tao Zhang; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Smelling Time: A Neural Basis for Olfactory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Barry W Ache; Andrew M Hein; Yuriy V Bobkov; Jose C Principe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Odor tracking flight of male Manduca sexta moths along plumes of different cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Mark A Willis; E A Ford; J L Avondet
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.