PURPOSE: Two phase I, single-agent studies were conducted to determine the dose and regimen of obatoclax, an antagonist of all BCL-2 antiapoptotic proteins, for evaluation in phase II trials. The two studies, GX001 and GX005, evaluated the safety and tolerability of weekly 1-hour and 3-hour infusions of obatoclax, respectively. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients in both studies were adults with solid tumor or lymphoma and performance status 0-1 for whom standard therapies were not appropriate. In the GX001 study an accelerated dose titration design was initially used with subsequent cohorts of three to six patients with 40% dose increments between levels. In the GX005 study three to six patients entered at each dose level with 40% dose increments between levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in studies GX001 (n = 8) and GX005 (n = 27). Clinically significant central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was observed using the 1-hour infusion schedule. The obatoclax maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in GX001 was 1.25 mg/m(2) due to these infusional CNS events. The 3-hour infusion schedule studied in GX005 had improved tolerability, and the obatoclax MTD was 20 mg/m(2). One patient in GX005 with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma achieved partial response of 2 months' duration, and one patient with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had stable disease for 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-hour infusion schedule of obatoclax was associated with neuropsychiatric dose-limiting toxicities at relatively low doses (MTD, 1.25 mg/m(2)). The 3-hour i.v. infusion of obatoclax administered once weekly to patients with solid tumors was better tolerated (MTD, 20 mg/m(2)), and evidence of clinical activity was observed. (c) 2010 AACR.
PURPOSE: Two phase I, single-agent studies were conducted to determine the dose and regimen of obatoclax, an antagonist of all BCL-2 antiapoptotic proteins, for evaluation in phase II trials. The two studies, GX001 and GX005, evaluated the safety and tolerability of weekly 1-hour and 3-hour infusions of obatoclax, respectively. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients in both studies were adults with solid tumor or lymphoma and performance status 0-1 for whom standard therapies were not appropriate. In the GX001 study an accelerated dose titration design was initially used with subsequent cohorts of three to six patients with 40% dose increments between levels. In the GX005 study three to six patients entered at each dose level with 40% dose increments between levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in studies GX001 (n = 8) and GX005 (n = 27). Clinically significant central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was observed using the 1-hour infusion schedule. The obatoclax maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in GX001 was 1.25 mg/m(2) due to these infusional CNS events. The 3-hour infusion schedule studied in GX005 had improved tolerability, and the obatoclax MTD was 20 mg/m(2). One patient in GX005 with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma achieved partial response of 2 months' duration, and one patient with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had stable disease for 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-hour infusion schedule of obatoclax was associated with neuropsychiatric dose-limiting toxicities at relatively low doses (MTD, 1.25 mg/m(2)). The 3-hour i.v. infusion of obatoclax administered once weekly to patients with solid tumors was better tolerated (MTD, 20 mg/m(2)), and evidence of clinical activity was observed. (c) 2010 AACR.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S Holdenrieder; P Stieber; H Bodenmüller; G Fertig; H Fürst; N Schmeller; M Untch; D Seidel Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Suzanne Trudel; Zhi Hua Li; Jennifer Rauw; Rodger E Tiedemann; Xiao Yan Wen; A Keith Stewart Journal: Blood Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Marina Konopleva; Julie Watt; Rooha Contractor; Twee Tsao; David Harris; Zeev Estrov; William Bornmann; Hagop Kantarjian; Jean Viallet; Ismael Samudio; Michael Andreeff Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Aaron D Schimmer; Susan O'Brien; Hagop Kantarjian; Joseph Brandwein; Bruce D Cheson; Mark D Minden; Karen Yee; Farhad Ravandi; Francis Giles; Andre Schuh; Vikas Gupta; Michael Andreeff; Charles Koller; Hong Chang; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Mark Berger; Jean Viallet; Gautam Borthakur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Susan M O'Brien; David F Claxton; Michael Crump; Stefan Faderl; Thomas Kipps; Michael J Keating; Jean Viallet; Bruce D Cheson Journal: Blood Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Wyndham H Wilson; Owen A O'Connor; Myron S Czuczman; Ann S LaCasce; John F Gerecitano; John P Leonard; Anil Tulpule; Kieron Dunleavy; Hao Xiong; Yi-Lin Chiu; Yue Cui; Todd Busman; Steven W Elmore; Saul H Rosenberg; Andrew P Krivoshik; Sari H Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jane Levesley; Meryl E Lusher; Janet C Lindsey; Steven C Clifford; Richard Grundy; Beth Coyle Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Tracy L Nero; Craig J Morton; Jessica K Holien; Jerome Wielens; Michael W Parker Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Paul K Paik; Charles M Rudin; Maria C Pietanza; Andrew Brown; Naiyer A Rizvi; Naoko Takebe; William Travis; Leonard James; Michelle S Ginsberg; Rosalyn Juergens; Susan Markus; Leslie Tyson; Sara Subzwari; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 5.705