Literature DB >> 20536823

The conservation and restoration of wild bees.

Rachael Winfree1.   

Abstract

Bees pollinate most of the world's wild plant species and provide economically valuable pollination services to crops; yet knowledge of bee conservation biology lags far behind other taxa such as vertebrates and plants. There are few long-term data on bee populations, which makes their conservation status difficult to assess. The best-studied groups are the genus Bombus (the bumble bees), and bees in the EU generally; both of these are clearly declining. However, it is not known to what extent these groups represent the approximately 20,000 species of bees globally. As is the case for insects in general, bees are underrepresented in conservation planning and protection efforts. For example, only two bee species are on the global IUCN Red List, and no bee is listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, even though many bee species are known to be in steep decline or possibly extinct. At present, bee restoration occurs mainly in agricultural contexts, funded by government programs such as agri-environment schemes (EU) and the Farm Bill (USA). This is a promising approach given that many bee species can use human-disturbed habitats, and bees provide valuable pollination services to crops. However, agricultural restorations only benefit species that persist in agricultural landscapes, and they are more expensive than preserving natural habitat elsewhere. Furthermore, such restorations benefit bees in only about half of studied cases. More research is greatly needed in many areas of bee conservation, including basic population biology, bee restoration in nonagricultural contexts, and the identification of disturbance-sensitive bee species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536823     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  27 in total

1.  Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Jeroen Scheper; Menno Reemer; Ruud van Kats; Wim A Ozinga; Giel T J van der Linden; Joop H J Schaminée; Henk Siepel; David Kleijn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts.

Authors:  Denise Margaret S Matias; Julia Leventon; Anna-Lena Rau; Christian Borgemeister; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; Jason Gibbs; Bryan N Danforth; David L Wagner; Shannon M Hedtke; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  From science to society: implementing effective strategies to improve wild pollinator health.

Authors:  Jane C Stout; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Do pesticide and pathogen interactions drive wild bee declines?

Authors:  Lars Straub; Verena Strobl; Orlando Yañez; Matthias Albrecht; Mark J F Brown; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.773

6.  A list of bees from three locations in the Northern Rockies Ecoregion (NRE) of western Montana.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Reese; Laura A Burkle; Casey M Delphia; Terry Griswold
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-10-30

7.  Field margins, foraging distances and their impacts on nesting pollinator success.

Authors:  Sean A Rands; Heather M Whitney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Landscape fragmentation and pollinator movement within agricultural environments: a modelling framework for exploring foraging and movement ecology.

Authors:  Sean A Rands
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination.

Authors:  Romina Rader; Ignasi Bartomeus; Lucas A Garibaldi; Michael P D Garratt; Brad G Howlett; Rachael Winfree; Saul A Cunningham; Margaret M Mayfield; Anthony D Arthur; Georg K S Andersson; Riccardo Bommarco; Claire Brittain; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Natacha P Chacoff; Martin H Entling; Benjamin Foully; Breno M Freitas; Barbara Gemmill-Herren; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sean R Griffin; Caroline L Gross; Lina Herbertsson; Felix Herzog; Juliana Hipólito; Sue Jaggar; Frank Jauker; Alexandra-Maria Klein; David Kleijn; Smitha Krishnan; Camila Q Lemos; Sandra A M Lindström; Yael Mandelik; Victor M Monteiro; Warrick Nelson; Lovisa Nilsson; David E Pattemore; Natália de O Pereira; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Menno Reemer; Maj Rundlöf; Cory S Sheffield; Jeroen Scheper; Christof Schüepp; Henrik G Smith; Dara A Stanley; Jane C Stout; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Michal Woyciechowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multilevel spatial structure impacts on the pollination services of Comarum palustre (Rosaceae).

Authors:  Laurent Somme; Carolin Mayer; Anne-Laure Jacquemart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.