Literature DB >> 2053667

What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking.

K M Cummings1, R Sciandra, A Gingrass, R Davis.   

Abstract

Despite overwhelming evidence documenting the hazards of cigarette smoking, the tobacco industry denies that smoking has been proven to cause disease. The industry professes a desire to clear up the smoking and health "question" and often points to its support of the Council for Tobacco Research (CTR) as evidence of its interest in investigating the health dangers of smoking. This paper presents results of a survey of CTR-funded scientists regarding their beliefs about the health dangers posed by smoking cigarettes. The vast majority of scientists funded by the CTR believe that cigarette smoking is an addiction that causes a wide range of serious, often fatal, diseases. This result suggests that the tobacco industry is unwilling to accept even the opinions of scientists it has deemed worthy of funding. Scientists should consider the ethical implications of accepting funds from the CTR and other tobacco industry-supported institutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Council for Tobacco Research; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2053667      PMCID: PMC1405206          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  1 in total

1.  Smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost--United States, 1988.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 17.586

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes.

Authors:  W M K Trochim; F A Stillman; P I Clark; C L Schmitt
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Intimidation of CTR-funded scientists claimed.

Authors:  T D Sterling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis.

Authors:  N Hirschhorn; S A Bialous; S Shatenstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; A Hyland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.

Authors:  J E Cohen; M Zeller; T Eissenberg; M Parascandola; R O'Keefe; L Planinac; S Leischow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.