Literature DB >> 16134578

Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980.

Mark Parascandola1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16134578      PMCID: PMC1497717          DOI: 10.1177/003335490512000320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  What's a cigarette company to do?

Authors:  Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.

Authors:  Lisa Bero
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Reducing tobacco harm: research challenges and issues.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; John Slade; Neal L Benowitz; Gary A Giovino; Ellen R Gritz; Scott Leischow; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Richard D Hurt; D Douglas Blanke
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

7.  Effects of cigarette smoking on dogs.

Authors:  E C Hammond; O Auerbach; D Kirman; L Garfinkel
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1970-12

8.  Smoking dogs: tobacco institute tries to discount cancer studies.

Authors:  R J Bazell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; A Hyland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Lawyer control of the tobacco industry's external research program. The Brown and Williamson documents.

Authors:  L Bero; D E Barnes; P Hanauer; J Slade; S A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Harm Reduction and electronic gambling machines: does this pair make a happy couple or is divorce foreseen?

Authors:  Michael Cantinotti; Robert Ladouceur
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2007-08-03

2.  Tobacco harm reduction and the evolution of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.

Authors:  J E Cohen; M Zeller; T Eissenberg; M Parascandola; R O'Keefe; L Planinac; S Leischow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research's 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documents.

Authors:  Cristin E Kearns; Stanton A Glantz; Laura A Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  Is smokeless tobacco use an appropriate public health strategy for reducing societal harm from cigarette smoking?

Authors:  Scott L Tomar; Brion J Fox; Herbert H Severson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Putting tobacco harm reduction in perspective: is it a viable alternative?

Authors:  Sonali Jhanjee
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Obsolete tobacco control themes can be hazardous to public health: the need for updating views on absolute product risks and harm reduction.

Authors:  Lynn T Kozlowski; David B Abrams
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.