BACKGROUND: Although both (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) imaging and (11)C-hydroxyephedrine ((11)C-HED) positron emission tomography (PET) are used for assessing cardiac sympathetic innervation, their relationship remains unknown. The aims were to determine whether (123)I-MIBG parameters such as heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) are associated with quantitative measures by (11)C-HED PET and to compare image quality, defect size, and location between (123)I-MIBG single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and (11)C-HED PET. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 39 ± 15%) underwent (123)I-MIBG imaging and (11)C-HED PET. Early (15-minute), late (3-hour) H/M, and washout rate (WR) were calculated for (123)I-MIBG. Myocardial retention and WR was calculated for (11)C-HED. Using a polar map approach, defect was defined as the area with relative activity <60% of the maximum. Both the early (r=0.76) and late (r=0.84) (123)I-MIBG H/M were correlated with (11)C-HED retention. (123)I-MIBG WR was correlated with (11)C-HED WR (r=0.57). Defect size could not be measured in 3 patients because of poor quality (123)I-MIBG SPECT, whereas (11)C-HED defect was measurable in all patients. Although defect size measured by early or late (123)I-MIBG SPECT was closely correlated with that by (11)C-HED PET (early: r=0.94; late: r=0.88), the late (123)I-MIBG overestimated defect size particularly in the inferior and septal regions. CONCLUSIONS: (123)I-MIBG H/M gives a reliable estimate of cardiac sympathetic innervation as measured by (11)C-HED PET. Furthermore, despite the close correlation in defect size, (11)C-HED PET appears to be more suitable for assessing regional abnormalities than does (123)I-MIBG SPECT.
BACKGROUND: Although both (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) imaging and (11)C-hydroxyephedrine ((11)C-HED) positron emission tomography (PET) are used for assessing cardiac sympathetic innervation, their relationship remains unknown. The aims were to determine whether (123)I-MIBG parameters such as heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) are associated with quantitative measures by (11)C-HED PET and to compare image quality, defect size, and location between (123)I-MIBG single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and (11)C-HED PET. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 39 ± 15%) underwent (123)I-MIBG imaging and (11)C-HED PET. Early (15-minute), late (3-hour) H/M, and washout rate (WR) were calculated for (123)I-MIBG. Myocardial retention and WR was calculated for (11)C-HED. Using a polar map approach, defect was defined as the area with relative activity <60% of the maximum. Both the early (r=0.76) and late (r=0.84) (123)I-MIBG H/M were correlated with (11)C-HED retention. (123)I-MIBG WR was correlated with (11)C-HED WR (r=0.57). Defect size could not be measured in 3 patients because of poor quality (123)I-MIBG SPECT, whereas (11)C-HED defect was measurable in all patients. Although defect size measured by early or late (123)I-MIBG SPECT was closely correlated with that by (11)C-HED PET (early: r=0.94; late: r=0.88), the late (123)I-MIBG overestimated defect size particularly in the inferior and septal regions. CONCLUSIONS: (123)I-MIBG H/M gives a reliable estimate of cardiac sympathetic innervation as measured by (11)C-HED PET. Furthermore, despite the close correlation in defect size, (11)C-HED PET appears to be more suitable for assessing regional abnormalities than does (123)I-MIBG SPECT.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Teresa Pellegrino; Valentina Piscopo; Antonio Boemio; Barbara Russo; Gianluca De Matteis; Sara Pellegrino; Sara Maria Delle Acque Giorgio; Manuela Amato; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2015-12
Authors: Ming Yu; Jody Bozek; Melanie Lamoy; Mikhail Kagan; Pedro Benites; David Onthank; Simon P Robinson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 9.236