INTRODUCTION: The Penumbra system is a newly approved mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke designed for better and faster recanalization. We describe our initial experience with the use of this device. METHODS: We studied 27 consecutive patients with acute ischemic strokes due to arterial occlusions presenting at our center from January to October 2009. The primary outcome was the degree of recanalization measured by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI grade 2/3) at the end of the procedure. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2 at 3 months, all-cause mortality and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) on non contrast computed tomography at 24 h. Procedural complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 27 patients (13 male, mean age 61 years) in the study, 22 (81%) patients had anterior circulation strokes and five (18%) had posterior circulation strokes. Twenty-three (85%) patients achieved TIMI grade 2/3 recanalization at completion of the procedure. Excluding five patients who needed use of a second device, the Penumbra system achieved TIMI grade 2/3 recanalization in 67% of patients. Thirteen (48%) patients had mRS ≤2 at 3-month follow-up. Procedural and post-procedural complications included vasospasm (3.7%), distal emboli (48.1%), and ICH (33.3%). The distribution of ICH is as follows: hemorrhagic infarct type 1 (25.9%), parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 (3.7%), and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 (3.7%). All-cause mortality was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: High recanalization rates and good clinical outcomes are achievable with the Penumbra system. Complication rates are comparable to a previously published literature.
INTRODUCTION: The Penumbra system is a newly approved mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke designed for better and faster recanalization. We describe our initial experience with the use of this device. METHODS: We studied 27 consecutive patients with acute ischemic strokes due to arterial occlusions presenting at our center from January to October 2009. The primary outcome was the degree of recanalization measured by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI grade 2/3) at the end of the procedure. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2 at 3 months, all-cause mortality and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) on non contrast computed tomography at 24 h. Procedural complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 27 patients (13 male, mean age 61 years) in the study, 22 (81%) patients had anterior circulation strokes and five (18%) had posterior circulation strokes. Twenty-three (85%) patients achieved TIMI grade 2/3 recanalization at completion of the procedure. Excluding five patients who needed use of a second device, the Penumbra system achieved TIMI grade 2/3 recanalization in 67% of patients. Thirteen (48%) patients had mRS ≤2 at 3-month follow-up. Procedural and post-procedural complications included vasospasm (3.7%), distal emboli (48.1%), and ICH (33.3%). The distribution of ICH is as follows: hemorrhagic infarct type 1 (25.9%), parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 (3.7%), and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 (3.7%). All-cause mortality was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: High recanalization rates and good clinical outcomes are achievable with the Penumbra system. Complication rates are comparable to a previously published literature.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Götz Thomalla; Jan Sobesky; Martin Köhrmann; Jochen B Fiebach; Jens Fiehler; Olivier Zaro Weber; Anna Kruetzelmann; Thomas Kucinski; Michael Rosenkranz; Joachim Röther; Peter D Schellinger Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Tobias Struffert; Martin Köhrmann; Tobias Engelhorn; Tim Nowe; Gregor Richter; Peter D Schellinger; Stefan Schwab; Arnd Doerfler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: W Hacke; M Kaste; C Fieschi; R von Kummer; A Davalos; D Meier; V Larrue; E Bluhmki; S Davis; G Donnan; D Schneider; E Diez-Tejedor; P Trouillas Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Wade S Smith; Gene Sung; Jeffrey Saver; Ronald Budzik; Gary Duckwiler; David S Liebeskind; Helmi L Lutsep; Marilyn M Rymer; Randall T Higashida; Sidney Starkman; Y Pierre Gobin; Donald Frei; Thomas Grobelny; Frank Hellinger; Dan Huddle; Chelsea Kidwell; Walter Koroshetz; Michael Marks; Gary Nesbit; Isaac E Silverman Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Michael Knauth; Raya Bshara; Katharina Schregel; Ioannis Tsogkas; Ismini Papageorgiou; Ilko Maier; Jan Liman; Daniel Behme Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons; Henry Ma; Helen M Dewey; David W Howells Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: T Kahles; C Garcia-Esperon; S Zeller; M Hlavica; J Añon; M Diepers; K Nedeltchev; L Remonda Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Bijoy K Menon; Puneet Kochar; Andrew Ah-Seng; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Jayesh Modi; John H Wong; Mark E Hudon; Will Morrish; Andrew M Demchuk; Mayank Goyal Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 2.804