Literature DB >> 20530853

Computing effective dose in cardiac CT.

Walter Huda1, Sameer Tipnis, Alexander Sterzik, U Joseph Schoepf.   

Abstract

We present a method of estimating effective doses in cardiac CT that accounts for selected techniques (kV mAs(-1)), anatomical location of the scan and patient size. A CT dosimetry spreadsheet (ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator) was used to estimate effective doses (E) using ICRP 103 weighting factors for a 70 kg patient undergoing cardiac CT examinations. Using dose length product (DLP) for the same scans, we obtained values of E/DLP for three CT scanners used in cardiac imaging from two vendors. E/DLP ratios were obtained as a function of the anatomical location in the chest and for x-ray tube voltages ranging from 80 to 140 kV. We also computed the ratio of the average absorbed dose in a water cylinder modeling a patient weighing W kg to the corresponding average absorbed dose in a water cylinder equivalent to a 70 kg patient. The average E/DLP for a 16 cm cardiac heart CT scan was 26 microSv (mGy cm)(-1), which is about 70% higher than the current E/DLP values used for chest CT scans (i.e. 14-17 microSv (mGy cm)(-1)). Our cardiac E/DLP ratios are higher because the cardiac region is approximately 30% more radiosensitive than the chest, and use of the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors increases cardiac CT effective doses by approximately 30%. Increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV increases the E/DLP conversion factor for cardiac CT by 17%. For the same incident radiation at 120 kV, doses in 45 kg adults were approximately 22% higher than those in 70 kg adults, whereas doses in 120 kg adults were approximately 28% lower. Accurate estimates of the patient effective dose in cardiac CT should use ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors, and account for a choice of scan techniques (kV mAs(-1)), exposed scan region, as well as patient size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530853     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Image quality in coronary CT angiography: challenges and technical solutions.

Authors:  Olivier Ghekiere; Rodrigo Salgado; Nico Buls; Tim Leiner; Isabelle Mancini; Piet Vanhoenacker; Paul Dendale; Alain Nchimi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Walter Huda; Janina Wilmskoetter; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Sameer V Tipnis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Evaluation of Effective Dose from CT Scans for Overweight and Obese Adult Patients Using the VirtualDose Software.

Authors:  Baohui Liang; Yiming Gao; Zhi Chen; X George Xu
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Estimating Effective Dose of Radiation From Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using a 64-MDCT Scanner: New Conversion Factors Relating Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Anjali Chelliah; Peter Prinsen; Carrie B Ruzal-Shapiro; Yanping Xu; Sachin Jambawalikar; Maxwell Amurao; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Sandra Halliburton; Carla M Thompson; Yanping Xu; Anjali Chelliah; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Boyu Peng; M Robert Peters; Jill E Jacobs; Munir Ghesani; James J Jang; Hussein Al-Khalidi; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-16

7.  Safety of coronary CT angiography and functional testing for stable chest pain in the PROMISE trial: A randomized comparison of test complications, incidental findings, and radiation dose.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Pamela S Douglas; James E Udelson; Elizabeth Adami; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Michael H Picard; Rhonda Roberts; Kerry L Lee; Andrew J Einstein; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez; William Carter; Michael Ridner; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-08-15

8.  A comparison of coronary CTA and stress testing using high-efficiency SPECT MPI for the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; John A Savino; Elliot J Levine; Usman Baber; Jonathan T Lin; Andrew J Einstein; Luke K Hermann; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Validity of the size-specific dose estimate in adults undergoing coronary CT angiography: comparison with the volume CT dose index.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Takeshi Nakaura; Noriyuki Kai; Takeshi Nozaki; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Timotheus G Watson; Eugene Mah; U Joseph Schoepf; Lydia King; Walter Huda; Anthony M Hlavacek
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.