Literature DB >> 20530193

Breath carbon monoxide output is affected by speed of emptying the lungs: implications for laboratory and smoking cessation research.

Bethany R Raiff1, Crystal Faix, Marissa Turturici, Jesse Dallery.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Researchers have used breath carbon monoxide (CO) cutoff values ranging from 4 to 10 ppm to define abstinence in cigarette-smoking cessation research and reductions in CO as a measure of acute abstinence in laboratory research. The current study used a reversal design to investigate effects of exhalation speed on CO output in four groups (non-, light, moderate, and heavy smokers; n = 20 per group).
METHODS: In one condition, participants were instructed to empty their lungs as quickly as possible (fast), whereas in a different condition, participants were instructed to empty their lungs at a slow pace (slow). Conditions were counterbalanced and repeated twice for each participant.
RESULTS: For all groups, speed of exhalation was significantly lower during the slow condition than during the fast condition, and CO output was significantly higher during the slow condition than during the fast condition. Sensitivity and specificity analyses revealed that the optimal CO cutoff for smoking abstinence was 3 ppm during the fast condition versus 4 ppm during the slow condition. Additionally, when heavy smokers switched from exhaling slow to exhaling fast, they showed an approximately 30% reduction in CO. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that exhalation speed should be monitored when CO is used as a measure of smoking status for laboratory and smoking cessation research. If exhalation speed is not monitored when using CO to verify smoking cessation, then more conservative CO cutoff values should be used to avoid false negative CO readings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530193      PMCID: PMC2910872          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  16 in total

1.  Cut-off levels for breath carbon monoxide as a marker for cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Martin A Javors; John P Hatch; Richard J Lamb
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Is there a health benefit of reduced tobacco consumption? A systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotta Pisinger; Nina S Godtfredsen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Effects of initial abstinence and programmed lapses on the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Laura L Chivers; Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Rebecca W Proskin; Colleen S Thomas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

5.  An Internet-based abstinence reinforcement treatment for cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Irene M Glenn; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 6.  US public health service clinical practice guideline: treating tobacco use and dependence.

Authors:  M C Fiore
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.258

7.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

8.  Smoking cessation intervention for female prisoners: addressing an urgent public health need.

Authors:  Karen Cropsey; Gloria Eldridge; Michael Weaver; Gabriela Villalobos; Maxine Stitzer; Al Best
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Shaping exhale durations for breath CO detection for men with mild mental retardation.

Authors:  Jerry Rea; Dean Williams
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

10.  End-tidal carbon monoxide corrected for lung volume is elevated in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Suzanne W Terheggen-Lagro; Marielle W Bink; Hendrik J Vreman; Cornelis K van der Ent
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  19 in total

1.  Using eye-tracking to examine how embedding risk corrective statements improves cigarette risk beliefs: Implications for tobacco regulatory policy.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Kathy Z Tang; Valentina Souprountchouk; Dana Campetti; Joseph N Cappella; Lynn T Kozlowski; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Authors:  Justin D Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-30

3.  Contingency management for behavior change: applications to promote brief smoking cessation among opioid-maintained patients.

Authors:  Kelly E Dunn; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Stacey C Sigmon
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Is self-efficacy for smoking abstinence a cause of, or a reflection on, smoking behavior change?

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Craig Parzynski; Melissa Mercincavage; Cynthia A Conklin; Carolyn A Fonte
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Optimal carbon monoxide criteria to confirm 24-hr smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Joshua L Karelitz; Nancy C Jao
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Assessment of smoking behaviour in the dental setting. A study comparing self-reported questionnaire data and exhaled carbon monoxide levels.

Authors:  Marc Frei; Odette Engel Brügger; Pedram Sendi; Peter A Reichart; Christoph A Ramseier; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Mobile, Remote, and Individual Focused: Comparing Breath Carbon Monoxide Readings and Abstinence Between Smartphone-Enabled and Stand-Alone Monitors.

Authors:  Breanna M Tuck; Joshua L Karelitz; Rachel L Tomko; Jennifer Dahne; Patrick Cato; Erin A McClure
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  How low should you go? Determining the optimal cutoff for exhaled carbon monoxide to confirm smoking abstinence when using cotinine as reference.

Authors:  Karen L Cropsey; Lindsay R Trent; Charles B Clark; Erin N Stevens; Adrienne C Lahti; Peter S Hendricks
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  A mobile-phone-based breath carbon monoxide meter to detect cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Steven E Meredith; Andrew Robinson; Philip Erb; Claire A Spieler; Noah Klugman; Prabal Dutta; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Longitudinal changes in smoking abstinence symptoms and alternative reinforcers predict long-term smoking cessation outcomes.

Authors:  Robert A Schnoll; Brian Hitsman; Sonja Blazekovic; Anna Veluz-Wilkins; E Paul Wileyto; Frank T Leone; Janet E Audrain-McGovern
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.