Literature DB >> 20528330

Converting condition-specific measures into preference-based outcomes for use in economic evaluation.

Jennifer Petrillo1, John Cairns.   

Abstract

Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) play an important role in reimbursement decisions when one of the criteria is the cost-effectiveness of the health technology. While for many generic QALYs (e.g., based on the EQ-5D) are viewed as the gold standard, there has been a considerable increase in interest in using condition-specific data to generate QALYs. There are two main methods: mapping from the condition-specific data to a generic health-related quality of life measure; and direct valuation of condition-specific health states. Whether one believes condition-specific data are useful even if generic QALY data are available, or simply that condition-specific data are helpful in the absence of generic measures of health-related quality of life, it is timely to review recent research activity directed at making greater use of condition-specific data to inform assessments of cost-effectiveness.

Year:  2008        PMID: 20528330     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.5.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  9 in total

1.  Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferences.

Authors:  Ralph Crott; Andrew Briggs
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-05-16

2.  Utility estimation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preference for change?

Authors:  Jennifer Petrillo; Floortje van Nooten; Paul Jones; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Estimation of a valuation function for a diabetes mellitus-specific preference-based measure of health: the Diabetes Utility Index.

Authors:  Murali Sundaram; Michael J Smith; Dennis A Revicki; Lesley-Ann Miller; Suresh Madhavan; Gerry Hobbs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Development of a preference-based index from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25.

Authors:  Anne M Rentz; Jonathan W Kowalski; John G Walt; Ron D Hays; John E Brazier; Ren Yu; Paul Lee; Neil Bressler; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Elicitation of health state utilities in soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Sarah L Shingler; Paul Swinburn; Andrew Lloyd; Jose Diaz; Robert Isbell; Stephanie Manson; Charlotte Benson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values.

Authors:  Gareth Furber; Leonie Segal; Matthew Leach; Jane Cocks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Condition-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A comparison of the EORTC-8D and the EQ-5D-3L.

Authors:  Paula K Lorgelly; Brett Doble; Donna Rowen; John Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Development of one general and six country-specific algorithms to assess societal health utilities based on ASAS HI.

Authors:  Ivette Essers; Mickael Hiligsmann; Uta Kiltz; Nick Bansback; Juergen Braun; Desirée van der Heijde; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-05-21

9.  The External Validity of Mapping MSIS-29 on EQ-5D Among Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis in Sweden.

Authors:  Olivia Ernstsson; Petter Tinghög; Kristina Alexanderson; Jan Hillert; Kristina Burström
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2017-02-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.