Literature DB >> 20526693

Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.

John E Dahlberg1, Nancy M Davidian.   

Abstract

The Division of Investigative Oversight within the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is responsible for conducting oversight review of institutional inquiries and investigations of possible research misconduct. It is also responsible for determining whether Public Health Service findings of research misconduct are warranted. Although ORI findings rely primarily on the scope and quality of the institution's analyses and determinations, ORI often has been able to strengthen the original findings by employing a variety of analytical methods, often computer based. Although ORI does not conduct inquiries or investigations, it has broad authority to provide assistance to institutions at all stages of their reviews of allegations. This assistance can range from providing advice on best practices, to legal assistance, to suggestions for how best to investigate specific allegations. When asked, ORI can also conduct certain forensic analyses, such as a statistical examination of questioned digits or a simple examination of a questioned figure in Photoshop. ORI will not provide opinions or render judgment on such analyses while the institution is still conducting its investigation. Such analyses can be done without knowing much else about the case.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526693     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

1.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Poehlman case: running away from the truth.

Authors:  John E Dahlberg; Christian C Mahler
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.

Authors:  Harold C Sox; Drummond Rennie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Changes in energy balance and body composition at menopause: a controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  E T Poehlman; M J Toth; A W Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.

Authors:  Patrick Okonta; Theresa Rossouw
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.294

2.  Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.

Authors:  Patrick I Okonta; Theresa Rossouw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.