Literature DB >> 16501657

The Poehlman case: running away from the truth.

John E Dahlberg1, Christian C Mahler.   

Abstract

Eric T. Poehlman, Ph.D., was an internationally recognized, tenured professor at the University of Vermont (UVM) in Burlington when, in October 2000, a junior member of Poehlman's laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area. This suspicion developed into one of the most significant cases of scientific misconduct in the history of the US Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Research Integrity (ORI), launching a US Department of Justice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and, eventually, to a much publicized guilty plea and felony conviction. In the end, Dr. Poehlman admitted to 54 findings of scientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI, agreed to retract or correct ten of his publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life. The United States Government's handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources of the US Attorney's Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal of prosecuting research fraud.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501657     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

1.  Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1989-08-08

2.  Determinants of decline in resting metabolic rate in aging females.

Authors:  E T Poehlman; M I Goran; A W Gardner; P A Ades; P J Arciero; S M Katzman-Rooks; S M Montgomery; M J Toth; P T Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-03

3.  Influence of endurance training on energy intake, norepinephrine kinetics, and metabolic rate in older individuals.

Authors:  E T Poehlman; A W Gardner; M I Goran
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.694

4.  Changes in energy balance and body composition at menopause: a controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  E T Poehlman; M J Toth; A W Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.

Authors:  John E Dahlberg; Nancy M Davidian
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A rhetorical analysis of apologies for scientific misconduct: do they really mean it?

Authors:  Lawrence Souder
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Honesty is the best policy: A brief overview of retraction notices.

Authors:  Ritesh G Menezes; Pradhum Ram; Huda Fatima; Brijesh Sathian
Journal:  Nepal J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  No One Likes a Snitch.

Authors:  Barbara Redman; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?

Authors:  Chris R Triggle; David J Triggle
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.