Literature DB >> 20525754

Patients with advanced head and neck cancers have similar progression-free survival on phase I trials and their last food and drug administration-approved treatment.

Ignacio Garrido-Laguna1, Filip Janku, Gerald S Falchook, Siqing Fu, David S Hong, Aung Naing, Joanne Aaron, Xuemei Wang, Merrill Kies, Razelle Kurzrock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of metastatic head and neck cancer patients treated in phase I clinical trials with clinical outcomes of those patients who had their last Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy in the setting of metastatic disease. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 61 consecutive patients with head and neck tumors treated in 36 phase I trials at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between July 2004 and September 2009.
RESULTS: The most common histology was head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (62%). Median age was 55 years (range, 26-80). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 for 95% of patients. Fifty-nine patients had received FDA-approved drugs as the backbone of their last systemic therapy before inclusion in phase I trials (median, 2 systemic therapies). Progression-free survival (PFS) on phase I trials was not inferior to PFS on their last FDA-approved therapies (12 versus 10.7 weeks, log-rank P = 0.87). Fifty-three patients were evaluable for response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Four (7%) had partial responses and 16 (26%) had stable disease for > or =4 months. In univariate analysis, number of metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at baseline, and Royal Marsden Hospital prognosis scores were significant predictors of survival. Only LDH was significant in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.35; P < or = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with heavily pretreated advanced head and neck tumors, PFS on phase I trials is not inferior to PFS with their last FDA-approved therapy. The only significant predictor of survival in the multivariate analysis was baseline LDH. (c) 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20525754     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes in 66 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in phase I trials: the NCCHE experience.

Authors:  Akihito Kawazoe; Kohei Shitara; Shota Fukuoka; Masaaki Noguchi; Yasutoshi Kuboki; Hideaki Bando; Wataru Okamoto; Takashi Kojima; Nozomu Fuse; Takayuki Yoshino; Atsushi Ohtsu; Toshihiko Doi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  The inverted pyramid of biomarker-driven trials.

Authors:  Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Manuel Hidalgo; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Wheler; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Aung Naing; Gerald Falchook; Sarina Piha-Paul; Siqing Fu; Stacy Moulder; Bettzy Stephen; Sijin Wen; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I clinic.

Authors:  Filip Janku; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Xuemei Wang; David S Hong; Aung Naing; Jing Gong; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Henrique A Parsons; Ralph G Zinner; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-21

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Gastrointestinal Malignancies Participating in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Aaron Denson; Nancy Burke; Georgine Wapinsky; Barbara Bertels; Tzu-Hua Juan; Jae Lee; Gregory M Springett; Jonathan R Strosberg; Richard D Kim; Dan M Sullivan; Amit Mahipal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.339

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.