BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Here evidence for reticulation in the pantropical orchid genus Polystachya is presented, using gene trees from five nuclear and plastid DNA data sets, first among only diploid samples (homoploid hybridization) and then with the inclusion of cloned tetraploid sequences (allopolyploids). Two groups of tetraploids are compared with respect to their origins and phylogenetic relationships. METHODS: Sequences from plastid regions, three low-copy nuclear genes and ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA were analysed for 56 diploid and 17 tetraploid accessions using maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference. Reticulation was inferred from incongruence between gene trees using supernetwork and consensus network analyses and from cloning and sequencing duplicated loci in tetraploids. KEY RESULTS: Diploid trees from individual loci showed considerable incongruity but little reticulation signal when support from more than one gene tree was required to infer reticulation. This was coupled with generally low support in the individual gene trees. Sequencing the duplicated gene copies in tetraploids showed clearer evidence of hybrid evolution, including multiple origins of one group of tetraploids included in the study. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cloning duplicate gene copies in allotetraploids and consensus network comparison of gene trees allowed a phylogenetic framework for reticulation in Polystachya to be built. There was little evidence for homoploid hybridization, but our knowledge of the origins and relationships of three groups of allotetraploids are greatly improved by this study. One group showed evidence of multiple long-distance dispersals to achieve a pantropical distribution; another showed no evidence of multiple origins or long-distance dispersal but had greater morphological variation, consistent with hybridization between more distantly related parents.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Here evidence for reticulation in the pantropical orchid genus Polystachya is presented, using gene trees from five nuclear and plastid DNA data sets, first among only diploid samples (homoploid hybridization) and then with the inclusion of cloned tetraploid sequences (allopolyploids). Two groups of tetraploids are compared with respect to their origins and phylogenetic relationships. METHODS: Sequences from plastid regions, three low-copy nuclear genes and ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA were analysed for 56 diploid and 17 tetraploid accessions using maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference. Reticulation was inferred from incongruence between gene trees using supernetwork and consensus network analyses and from cloning and sequencing duplicated loci in tetraploids. KEY RESULTS: Diploid trees from individual loci showed considerable incongruity but little reticulation signal when support from more than one gene tree was required to infer reticulation. This was coupled with generally low support in the individual gene trees. Sequencing the duplicated gene copies in tetraploids showed clearer evidence of hybrid evolution, including multiple origins of one group of tetraploids included in the study. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of cloning duplicate gene copies in allotetraploids and consensus network comparison of gene trees allowed a phylogenetic framework for reticulation in Polystachya to be built. There was little evidence for homoploid hybridization, but our knowledge of the origins and relationships of three groups of allotetraploids are greatly improved by this study. One group showed evidence of multiple long-distance dispersals to achieve a pantropical distribution; another showed no evidence of multiple origins or long-distance dispersal but had greater morphological variation, consistent with hybridization between more distantly related parents.
Authors: Meredith M Thomas; Nancy C Garwood; William J Baker; Sally A Henderson; Stephen J Russell; Donald R Hodel; Richard M Bateman Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2005-10-24 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Nicola M Anthony; Stephen L Clifford; Mireille Bawe-Johnson; Kate A Abernethy; Michael W Bruford; E Jean Wickings Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: William J Baker; Maria V Norup; James J Clarkson; Thomas L P Couvreur; John L Dowe; Carl E Lewis; Jean-Christophe Pintaud; Vincent Savolainen; Tomas Wilmot; Mark W Chase Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Reinhold Stockenhuber; Stefan Zoller; Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi; Felix Gugerli; Kentaro K Shimizu; Alex Widmer; Martin C Fischer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240