Literature DB >> 20525570

Paleontology, genomics, and combined-data phylogenetics: can molecular data improve phylogeny estimation for fossil taxa?

John J Wiens1.   

Abstract

The genomics revolution offers great promise for resolving the phylogeny of living taxa, but does it offer any benefits for reconstructing relationships among extinct (fossil) taxa? Superficially, the answer would seem to be "no," given that molecular data cannot be obtained for most fossil taxa. However, because fossil taxa often interdigitate among living taxa on the Tree of Life, molecular data may indirectly enhance phylogenetic accuracy for fossil taxa in the context of a combined analysis of morphological and molecular data for living and fossil taxa. Here, I use simulations to assess accuracy for fossil taxa in a mixed analysis of living and fossil taxa, before and after addition of molecular data to the living taxa. The results show conditions where the accuracy for fossil taxa is greatly increased by adding molecular data, sometimes by as much as 100%. In other cases, the increase is negligible, such as when fossil taxa greatly outnumber living taxa in the analysis. However, there were few cases where accuracy was significantly decreased by the addition of the molecular data, suggesting that this practice may range from highly beneficial to mostly harmless. Overall, the results suggest that improvements in molecular phylogenetics can potentially benefit phylogeny reconstruction for fossil taxa.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20525570     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  12 in total

1.  Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data.

Authors:  David W Bapst; Holly A Schreiber; Sandra J Carlson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the flightless Mancallinae (Aves, Pan-Alcidae).

Authors:  Neil Adam Smith
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology.

Authors:  Robert J Asher; Martin R Smith
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

4.  Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling.

Authors:  John J Wiens; Jonathan Tiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Understanding phylogenetic incongruence: lessons from phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Liliana M Dávalos; Andrea L Cirranello; Jonathan H Geisler; Nancy B Simmons
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-08-14

6.  Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Christy A Hipsley; Johannes Müller
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  A new Miocene baleen whale from the Peruvian desert.

Authors:  Felix G Marx; Naoki Kohno
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Total evidence phylogeny and evolutionary timescale for Australian faunivorous marsupials (Dasyuromorphia).

Authors:  Shimona Kealy; Robin Beck
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  GenePainter: a fast tool for aligning gene structures of eukaryotic protein families, visualizing the alignments and mapping gene structures onto protein structures.

Authors:  Björn Hammesfahr; Florian Odronitz; Stefanie Mühlhausen; Stephan Waack; Martin Kollmar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  From algae to angiosperms-inferring the phylogeny of green plants (Viridiplantae) from 360 plastid genomes.

Authors:  Brad R Ruhfel; Matthew A Gitzendanner; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; J Gordon Burleigh
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.