Literature DB >> 20524844

Evaluation of soft tissue coverage over porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers within nonhealing alveolar bone defects.

James D Kretlow1, Meng Shi, Simon Young, Patrick P Spicer, Nagi Demian, John A Jansen, Mark E Wong, F Kurtis Kasper, Antonios G Mikos.   

Abstract

Current treatment of traumatic craniofacial injuries often involves early free tissue transfer, even if the recipient site is contaminated or lacks soft tissue coverage. There are no current tissue engineering strategies to definitively regenerate tissues in such an environment at an early time point. For a tissue engineering approach to be employed in the treatment of such injuries, a two-stage approach could potentially be used. The present study describes methods for fabrication, characterization, and processing of porous polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) space maintainers for temporary retention of space in bony craniofacial defects. Carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels were used as a porogen. Implants with controlled porosity and pore interconnectivity were fabricated by varying the ratio of hydrogel:polymer and the amount of carboxymethylcellulose within the hydrogel. The in vivo tissue response to the implants was observed by implanting solid, low-porosity, and high-porosity implants (n = 6) within a nonhealing rabbit mandibular defect that included an oral mucosal defect to allow open communication between the oral cavity and the mandibular defect. Oral mucosal wound healing was observed after 12 weeks and was complete in 3/6 defects filled with solid PMMA implants and 5/6 defects filled with either a low- or high-porosity PMMA implant. The tissue response around and within the pores of the two formulations of porous implants tested in vivo was characterized, with the low-porosity implants surrounded by a minimal but well-formed fibrous capsule in contrast to the high-porosity implants, which were surrounded and invaded by almost exclusively inflammatory tissue. On the basis of these results, PMMA implants with limited porosity hold promise for temporary implantation and space maintenance within clean/contaminated bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524844      PMCID: PMC3003916          DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  71 in total

1.  Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area. Bruens ML, Pieterman H, de Wijn JR, et al. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14:63-68.

Authors:  Kelly A Lenton; Randall P Nacamuli; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Time course of membrane microarchitecture-driven neovascularization.

Authors:  R F Padera; C K Colton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Porous acrylic cement: evaluation of a novel implant material.

Authors:  P J van Mullem; J R de Wijn; J M Vaandrager
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  A comparative study of epithelialization of subcutaneous fascial flaps and muscle-only flaps in the oral cavity. A rabbit model.

Authors:  E E Elshal; T Inokuchi; S Yoshida; J Sekine; K Sano; H Ninomiya; H Ikeda
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Healing of the oral mucosa with the use of collagen artificial skin.

Authors:  M P Levin; P J Tsaknis; D E Cutright
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 6.  Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: an evidence-based outcome assessment.

Authors:  J T Mellonig; M Nevins
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Definitive management of severe facial trauma utilizing free tissue transfer.

Authors:  Neal D Futran; D Gregory Farwell; Russell B Smith; Paul E Johnson; Gerry F Funk
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Ectopic bone formation in rats: the importance of vascularity of the acceptor site.

Authors:  Ed H M Hartman; Johan W M Vehof; J E de Ruijter; Paul H M Spauwen; John A Jansen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Healing pattern of experimental soft tissue lacerations after application of novel topical anesthetic agents - an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Adel Al-Asfour; Manal Al-Melh; Lars Andersson; Bobby Joseph
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Histologic response to porous PMMA implant materials.

Authors:  D Nathanson; L Gettleman; P Schnitman; G Shklar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1978-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

2.  A composite critical-size rabbit mandibular defect for evaluation of craniofacial tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Simon Young; Julia L Goldman; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  In situ formation of porous space maintainers in a composite tissue defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Allan M Henslee; Meng Shi; Simon Young; Nagi Demian; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs.

Authors:  Eliza L S Fong; Brendan M Watson; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Founder's award to Antonios G. Mikos, Ph.D., 2011 Society for Biomaterials annual meeting and exposition, Orlando, Florida, April 13-16, 2011: Bones to biomaterials and back again--20 years of taking cues from nature to engineer synthetic polymer scaffolds.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Antibiotic-releasing porous polymethylmethacrylate/gelatin/antibiotic constructs for craniofacial tissue engineering.

Authors:  Meng Shi; James D Kretlow; Patrick P Spicer; Yasuhiko Tabata; Nagi Demian; Mark E Wong; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Econazole-releasing porous space maintainers for fungal periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Alexander M Tatara; Allison J Rozich; Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis; Emma Watson; Nathaniel D Albert; George N Bennett; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  A rapid, flexible method for incorporating controlled antibiotic release into porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  P M Mountziaris; S R Shah; J Lam; G N Bennett; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.843

9.  Epithelialization Over a Scaffold of Antibiotic-Impregnated PMMA Beads: A Salvage Technique for Open Tibial Fractures with Bone and Soft Tissue Loss When all Else Fails.

Authors:  Karim Z Masrouha; Youssef El-Bitar; Marc Najjar; Said Saghieh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-06

10.  Dual-functional porous and cisplatin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement for reconstruction of load-bearing bone defect kills bone tumor cells.

Authors:  Zhule Wang; Liebert Parreiras Nogueira; Håvard Jostein Haugen; Ingrid Cm Van Der Geest; Patricia Caetano de Almeida Rodrigues; Dennis Janssen; Thom Bitter; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sander Cg Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.