Literature DB >> 20522055

Electrocardiographic differentiation between acute pulmonary embolism and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes at the bedside.

Krzysztof Jankowski1, Maciej Kostrubiec, Patrycja Ozdowska, Blanka Milanowska-Puncewicz, Szymon Pacho, Justyna Pedowska-Włoszek, Anna Kaczyńska, Andrzej Labyk, Anna Hrynkiewicz, Piotr Pruszczyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical picture of acute pulmonary embolism (APE), with wide range of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities can mimic acute coronary syndromes.
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of standard 12-lead ECG usefulness in differentiation at the bedside between APE and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 143 patients: 98 consecutive patients (mean age 63.4 +/- 19.4 year, 45 M) with APE and 45 consecutive patients (mean age 72.8 +/- 10.8 year, 44 M) with NSTE-ACS. Standard ECGs recorded on admission were compared in separated groups.
RESULTS: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) and S(1)S(2)S(3) or S(1)Q(3)T(3) pattern were found in similar frequency in both groups (10 [11%] APE patients vs 6 [14%] NSTE-ACS patients, 27 [28%] patients vs 7 [16%] patients, respectively, NS). Negative T waves in leads V(1-3) together with negative T waves in inferior wall leads II, III, aVF (OR 1.3 [1.14-1.68]) significantly indicated APE with a positive predictive value of 85% and specificity of 87%. However, counterclockwise axis rotation (OR 4.57 [2.74-7.61]), ventricular premature beats (OR 2.60 [1.60-4.19]), ST depression in leads V(1-3) (OR 2.25 [1.43-3.56]), and negative T waves in leads V(5-6) (OR 2.08 [1.31-3.29]) significantly predicted NSTE-ACS.
CONCLUSIONS: RBBB, S(1)S(2)S(3), or S(1)Q(3)T(3) pattern described as characteristic for APE were not helpful in the differentiation between APE and NSTE-ACS in studied group. Coexistence of negative T waves in precordial leads V(1-3) and inferior wall leads may suggest APE diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522055      PMCID: PMC6932174          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00355.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M Rodger; D Makropoulos; M Turek; J Quevillon; F Raymond; P Rasuli; P S Wells
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Right ventricular infarction in a patient with acute pulmonary embolism and normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Piotr Pruszczyk; Marcin Szulc; Grzegorz Horszczaruk; Hubert Gurba; Malgorzata Kobylecka
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-05-12

3.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bassand; Christian W Hamm; Diego Ardissino; Eric Boersma; Andrzej Budaj; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Keith A A Fox; David Hasdai; E Magnus Ohman; Lars Wallentin; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads--80 case reports.

Authors:  E Ferrari; A Imbert; T Chevalier; A Mihoubi; P Morand; M Baudouy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Electrocardiographic differentiation between acute pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndromes on the basis of negative T waves.

Authors:  Masami Kosuge; Kazuo Kimura; Toshiyuki Ishikawa; Toshiaki Ebina; Kiyoshi Hibi; Ikuyoshi Kusama; Tatuya Nakachi; Mitsuaki Endo; Naohiro Komura; Satoshi Umemura
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Prevalence of normal coronary angiography in the acute phase of suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the PRAGUE studies.

Authors:  P Widimsky; B Stellova; L Groch; M Aschermann; M Branny; M Zelizko; J Stasek; P Formanek
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram at hospital admission in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  N Sreeram; E C Cheriex; J L Smeets; A P Gorgels; H J Wellens
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P D Stein; M L Terrin; C A Hales; H I Palevsky; H A Saltzman; B T Thompson; J G Weg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  QT interval prolongation with global T-wave inversion: a novel ECG finding in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Punukollu; Ramesh M Gowda; Ijaz A Khan; Sabrina L Wilbur; Balendu C Vasavada; Terrence J Sacchi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Pulmonary embolism mimicking anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregory T Wilson; Frederick A Schaller
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2008-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The year of 2010 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  The Role of Transmural Repolarization Gradient in the Inversion of Cardiac Electric Field: Model Study of ECG in Hypothermia.

Authors:  Natalia V Arteyeva; Jan E Azarov
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Acute myocardial infarction and massive pulmonary embolus presenting as cardiac arrest: initial rhythm as a diagnostic clue.

Authors:  Nirmanmoh Bhatia; Haree Vongooru; Sohail Ikram
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.