Martee L Hensley1. 1. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA. gynbreast@mskcc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The combination of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel has become an established treatment option for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma and has demonstrated efficacy in nonleiomyosarcoma histology soft-tissue sarcomas. The activity of this regimen in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma, other soft-tissue sarcomas, and pediatric sarcomas is discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel achieved high objective response rates in three prospective phase II studies as first-line or second-line therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma. In a randomized trial, the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel was superior to gemcitabine alone in terms of objective response, progression-free, and overall survival among patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, most of whom had received at least one prior cytotoxic regimen. In a prospective phase II trial, four of 10 pediatric patients with sarcomas achieved complete responses with this regimen. In a small, prospective phase II trial for women with completely resected stage I, II, III, or IV high-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma, adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with a 2-year progression-free survival rate that appears superior to that of historical controls. SUMMARY: Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel is a reasonable treatment option for patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. The regimen is a good choice as first-line or second-line therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma. The role of adjuvant gemcitabine-docetaxel in completely resected, uterine-limited, high-grade leiomyosarcoma is under investigation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The combination of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel has become an established treatment option for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma and has demonstrated efficacy in nonleiomyosarcoma histology soft-tissue sarcomas. The activity of this regimen in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma, other soft-tissue sarcomas, and pediatric sarcomas is discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel achieved high objective response rates in three prospective phase II studies as first-line or second-line therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma. In a randomized trial, the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel was superior to gemcitabine alone in terms of objective response, progression-free, and overall survival among patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, most of whom had received at least one prior cytotoxic regimen. In a prospective phase II trial, four of 10 pediatric patients with sarcomas achieved complete responses with this regimen. In a small, prospective phase II trial for women with completely resected stage I, II, III, or IV high-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma, adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with a 2-year progression-free survival rate that appears superior to that of historical controls. SUMMARY: Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel is a reasonable treatment option for patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. The regimen is a good choice as first-line or second-line therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma. The role of adjuvant gemcitabine-docetaxel in completely resected, uterine-limited, high-grade leiomyosarcoma is under investigation.
Authors: William W Tseng; Shouhao Zhou; Christina A To; Peter F Thall; Alexander J Lazar; Raphael E Pollock; Patrick P Lin; Janice N Cormier; Valerae O Lewis; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Matthew T Ballo; Shreyaskumar Patel; Peter W T Pisters Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Johanna K Morales; Sheinei J Saleem; Rebecca K Martin; Bryan L Saunders; Brian O Barnstein; Travis W Faber; Nicholas A Pullen; Elizabeth Motunrayo Kolawole; Keith B Brooks; Sarah K Norton; Jamie Sturgill; Laura Graham; Harry D Bear; Joseph F Urban; Chris S Lantz; Daniel H Conrad; John J Ryan Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Javier E Oesterheld; Damon R Reed; Bhuvana A Setty; Michael S Isakoff; Patrick Thompson; Hong Yin; Masanori Hayashi; David M Loeb; Tiffany Smith; Rikesh Makanji; Brooke L Fridley; Lars M Wagner Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Elena García-Martínez; Lucas Egea Prefasi; Jesús García-Donas; Pedro Pablo Escolar-Pérez; Francisco Pastor; Antonio González-Martín Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Kristelle Lusby; Kari Brewer Savannah; Elizabeth G Demicco; Yiqun Zhang; Markus Ph Ghadimi; Eric D Young; Chiara Colombo; Ryan Lam; Tugce E Dogan; Jason L Hornick; Alexander J Lazar; Kelly K Hunt; Matthew L Anderson; Chad J Creighton; Dina Lev; Raphael E Pollock Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sarah L Shingler; Paul Swinburn; Andrew Lloyd; Jose Diaz; Robert Isbell; Stephanie Manson; Charlotte Benson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 4.147