Literature DB >> 20519656

Incidence and trend of a metabolic syndrome phenotype among Tehranian adolescents: findings from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 1998-2001 to 2003-2006.

Mohammad Afkhami-Ardekani1, Saleh Zahedi-Asl, Maryam Rashidi, Mitra Atifah, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Fereidoun Azizi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and trend of the metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study during 3.6 years of follow-up. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 932 adolescents, aged 10-19 years, who had complete data and returned for reassessment 3.6 years later were investigated.
RESULTS: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome at baseline and after 3.6 years was 7.4 and 6.7%, respectively, based on the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III definitions; 3.5 and 8.0%, respectively, based on the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions; 4.1 and 9.4%, respectively, based on the American Heart Association (AHA) definitions; and 13.6 and 13.4%, respectively, based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) definitions. Incidence rates were 5.2% (95% CI 3-6) based on ATP III, 6.8% (5-8) based on IDF, 8.3% (6-10) based on AHA, and 8.8% (6-10) based on NHANES definitions.
CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of metabolic syndrome is high in Tehranian adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519656      PMCID: PMC2928373          DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   17.152


The metabolic syndrome, defined as a group of risk factors, including obesity, impaired glucose metabolism, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, is associated with a heightened risk for developing cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes and an enhanced mortality from all causes (1–3). The aim of this study was to assess incidence and trend of metabolic syndrome prevalence in adolescents of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) after 3.6 years of follow-up.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was conducted within the framework of the TLGS, a prospective study performed in a representative 15,005 individuals aged 3–85 years and residents of one district of Tehran (4). Adolescents, aged 10–19 years, who had complete data and returned for reassessment 3.6 years later were included in this study. Subjects who were pregnant or who were taking medications that affect serum lipids, blood pressure, and carbohydrate metabolism were excluded in the study. The final sample consisted of 932 adolescents, who were first assessed in 1999–2001 and reassessed in 2003–2005. Details of the TLGS protocol and all laboratory procedures were published elsewhere (4). Overweight was defined as at or above the 95th percentile of BMI for age. At risk for overweight was defined as at or above the 85th percentile but less than the 95th percentile of BMI for age (5). In this study, pediatric definitions of metabolic syndrome by the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Panel III [ATP III]) (6), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (7), the American Heart Association (AHA) (8), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (9) were used.

RESULTS

A total of 932 adolescents (530 [56.9%] girls and 402 [43.1%] boys), mean age 14.38 ± 2.85 years, were studied. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the ATP III at baseline was 7.4% (95% CI 5.7–9) and after 3.6 years of follow-up was 6.7% (5–8) (Table 1). There was a significant association between metabolic syndrome prevalence (according to ATP III criteria) and BMI, as 57.9% of overweight adolescents had the metabolic syndrome compared with 29.2% of adolescents at risk for overweight and 2.4% of adolescents with normal weight (P < 0.0001).
Table 1

Baseline and follow-up prevalence, incidence, and instability of metabolic syndrome in adolescents: the TLGS

DefinitionPrevalence (95% CI) (baseline)
Instability (95% CI)*
Incidence (95% CI)
Follow-up prevalence (95% CI)
TotalBaseline overweightTotalBaseline overweightTotalBaseline overweightTotalBaseline overweight
Pediatric AHA4.1 (2.8–5)34.2 (19–49)2.6 (1.5–3)15.8 (4–27)8.3 (6–10)48 (53–96)9.4 (7–11)50 (34–65)
Pediatric ATP III7.4 (5.7–9)57.9 (42–73)5.6 (4–7)36.8 (21–52)5.2 (3–6)44 (19–68)6.7 (5–8)32 (16–46)
Pediatric NHANES III13.6 (11–15)63.2 (47–78)7.8 (6–9)31.6 (16–46)8.8 (6–10)50 (19–68)13.4 (11–15)50 (34–65)
Pediatric IDF3.5 (2.3–4.7)34.2 (19–49)2 (1–2)21.1 (8–34)6.8 (5–8)36 (31–80)8 (6–9)37 (21–52)

*Instability was defined as the percentage of baseline metabolic syndrome–positive adolescents who were metabolic syndrome–negative at follow-up.

†Incidence was defined as the proportion of new cases from those adolescents who had been metabolic syndrome–negative at baseline.

Baseline and follow-up prevalence, incidence, and instability of metabolic syndrome in adolescents: the TLGS *Instability was defined as the percentage of baseline metabolic syndrome–positive adolescents who were metabolic syndrome–negative at follow-up. †Incidence was defined as the proportion of new cases from those adolescents who had been metabolic syndrome–negative at baseline. High fasting triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol were the most prevalent components according to ATP III criteria (38.4 and 41.6%, respectively), whereas high fasting blood glucose (FBG) was the least common (1%). Lowering the FBG cut point from 110 to 100 mg/dl increased the percentage of subjects who met this standard from 1 to 7.6%, and lowering waist circumference cut point from the 90th percentile to the 75th percentile for sex and age increased the proportion of subjects who met this standard from 10.3 to 27.3%. The logistic regression of metabolic risks on metabolic syndrome incidence (positive versus negative) was significant (likelihood ratio χ2 = 70.64, P = 0.0001). When BMI and waist circumference were put in logistic regression, we found strong a association of these variables with metabolic syndrome incidence. Overweight adolescents were 5.69 times as likely to develop metabolic syndrome (95% CI 2.31–13.96). Subjects with waist circumference more than the 90th percentile for age and sex had 2.24 times more chance to develop metabolic syndrome (95% CI 1.01–4.97). On logistic regression, no significant association was seen between FBG, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, and age with metabolic syndrome incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study show that prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Tehranian adolescents has changed at follow-up, according to all definitions except for the NHANES definition. The metabolic syndrome phenotype was most common in overweight adolescents, with a prevalence of 57.9% compared with 29.2% of adolescents at risk for overweight and only 2.4% of normal weight. The difference in metabolic syndrome among overweight subjects was noticeable and shows the importance of overweight on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. In addition, adolescents who were overweight were 5.69 times as likely to develop metabolic syndrome. This can indicate that metabolic syndrome is greatly confined to overweight adolescents. The most common metabolic risks in our subjects were high triglyceride and low HDL cholesterol levels. These findings are in accordance with several previous studies conducted among children and adults in our area (10). The high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and high triglyceride levels in Iran and other Asian countries (10,11) strengthens the hypothetical ethnic predisposition toward this type of dyslipidemia among Asians (12). Diets with high trans-unsaturated fat could lower HDL cholesterol levels, increase triglyceride levels, and impede metabolism of fatty acids. Kelishadi et al. (13) indicated that the poor quality of the consumed fat, being rich in saturated and trans-fatty acids, correlated with the high prevalence of dyslipidemia among adolescents in Iran. In addition, they found that the risk of the metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents rose with the consumption of solid hydrogenated fat and white-flour bread (14). These findings potentiate the speculation that some food habits may play a role in metabolic syndrome development. The high glucose level was the least common metabolic risk according to ATP III criteria. This finding supports a change in the thought of the metabolic syndrome from that of a single entity causally associated with insulin resistance to one in which the syndrome depicts several distinct but intercorrelated entities (12). Nevertheless, when we lowered FBG cut point from 110 to 100 mg/dl, the proportion of subjects who met this amount increased to 7.6%. This shift has also been reported in the Duncan Study (15). These results call into question of the utility of the FBG cut points in pediatric definitions of metabolic syndrome. Our findings show that prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome, as a major risk factor for chronic diseases, is high in Tehranian adolescents. Prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome increased with the severity of obesity and reached to nearly 60% in overweight adolescents. We conclude that health professionals and policy makers should concentrate on primary prevention of childhood obesity and the metabolic syndrome, especially in developing countries in nutrition transition, which are facing an epidemic of chronic diseases in the near future.
  14 in total

1.  The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men.

Authors:  Hanna-Maaria Lakka; David E Laaksonen; Timo A Lakka; Leo K Niskanen; Esko Kumpusalo; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Jukka T Salonen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Turkish adults.

Authors:  O Kozan; A Oguz; A Abaci; C Erol; Z Ongen; A Temizhan; S Celik
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome X).

Authors:  S M Haffner; R A Valdez; H P Hazuda; B D Mitchell; P A Morales; M P Stern
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 4.  Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization.

Authors:  S Yusuf; S Reddy; S Ounpuu; S Anand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States: improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Robert J Kuczmarski; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Shumei Guo; Rong Wei; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome at age 16 using the International Diabetes Federation paediatric definition.

Authors:  J Pirkola; T Tammelin; A Bloigu; A Pouta; J Laitinen; A Ruokonen; P Tapanainen; M-R Järvelin; M Vääräsmäki
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  Stephen Cook; Michael Weitzman; Peggy Auinger; Michael Nguyen; William H Dietz
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-08

8.  Dietary fat intake and lipid profiles of Iranian adolescents: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program--Heart Health Promotion from Childhood.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Mahin Hashemi Pour; Nizal Sarraf Zadegan; Manijeh Kahbazi; Gholamhosein Sadry; Amad Amani; Rezvan Ansari; Hassan Alikhassy; Nasrollah Bashardoust
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in American adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Sarah D de Ferranti; Kimberlee Gauvreau; David S Ludwig; Ellis J Neufeld; Jane W Newburger; Nader Rifai
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Components of the "metabolic syndrome" and incidence of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Robert L Hanson; Giuseppina Imperatore; Peter H Bennett; William C Knowler
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  7 in total

1.  Metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zebenay Workneh Bitew; Ayinalem Alemu; Ermias Getaneh Ayele; Zelalem Tenaw; Anmut Alebel; Teshager Worku
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  The Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes Among Elementary School Children in Birjand.

Authors:  Tayyebeh Chahkandi; Fatemeh Taheri; Toba Kazemi; Bita Bijari
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 0.364

Review 3.  A systematic review on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranian children and adolescents.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Silva Hovsepian; Shirin Djalalinia; Fahimeh Jamshidi; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 4.  Prevalence and Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Azad Fatahi; Amin Doosti-Irani; Zahra Cheraghi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 5.  Metabolic Syndrome: Findings from 20 Years of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Authors:  Firoozeh Hosseini-Esfahani; Zahra Bahadoran; Nazanin Moslehi; Golaleh Asghari; Emad Yuzbashian; Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi; Parvin Mirmiran; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-10-21

6.  Fast Food Intake Increases the Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Authors:  Golaleh Asghari; Emad Yuzbashian; Parvin Mirmiran; Behnaz Mahmoodi; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The glucose metabolism disorder and dyslipidemia among girls with different phenotype polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Marzieh Akbarzadeh; Tahereh Naderi; Mohammad H Dabbaghmanesh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.852

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.