Literature DB >> 20519414

Correlations between activated clotting time values and heparin concentration measurements in young infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Nina A Guzzetta1, Heather G Monitz, Janet D Fernandez, Tom M Fazlollah, Andrea Knezevic, Bruce E Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring heparin concentration along with the activated clotting time (ACT) may provide a more accurate guide for the administration of heparin to infants during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, standard laboratory assays of heparin concentration (antifactor Xa heparin concentration) require plasma instead of whole blood, and results are not immediately available to clinicians. Alternatively, measurements of whole blood heparin concentration may be performed at the bedside using an automated protamine titration device, the Hepcon instrument (Hepcon Hemostasis Management System Plus; Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN). The purpose of this investigation was to compare ACT measurements from 3 commercially available instruments and bedside measurements of whole blood heparin concentration using the Hepcon instrument with laboratory measurements of antifactor Xa plasma heparin concentration in infants younger than 6 months of age undergoing CPB.
METHODS: Forty-four pediatric patients younger than 6 months of age scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were drawn 3 minutes after the initial heparin bolus and immediately before the termination of CPB to obtain measurements of heparin anticoagulation. Kaolin-activated ACTs were performed with the Hemochron (International Technidyne Corporation, Edison, NJ), Hepcon, and i-STAT (i-STAT Corporation, East Windsor, NJ) instruments. Whole blood heparin concentration was measured using the Hepcon instrument. Plasma heparin concentration was measured using an antifactor Xa chromogenic substrate assay.
RESULTS: Immediately after the initial heparin bolus, none of the ACT values correlated with plasma heparin concentration. When measured immediately before the termination of CPB, only the i-STAT ACT showed a moderate correlation. Conversely, bedside measurements of whole blood heparin concentration showed satisfactory agreement with laboratory measurements of plasma heparin concentration at both time points (concordance correlation coefficients 0.30 and 0.67, respectively). There is a bias in that antifactor Xa-measured plasma heparin concentration tends to be higher than Hepcon-measured whole blood heparin concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: In infants younger than 6 months old undergoing CPB, caution is warranted when using ACT values as the sole indication of adequate heparin anticoagulation. In general, ACT prolongation correlates poorly with plasma heparin concentration. Only i-STAT ACT values showed a moderate correlation when measured immediately before the termination of CPB. Alternatively, bedside measurements of whole blood heparin concentration measured by the Hepcon instrument agreed well with antifactor Xa laboratory measurements. Our data support the clinical utility of bedside measurements of heparin concentration to provide timely, convenient, and accurate measurements of heparin concentration in these infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519414     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e13470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  Opposite effects of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb aqueous extracts on blood coagulation function.

Authors:  Xianming Fei; Wufeng Yuan; Lei Jiang; Huan Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  Effect of New Heparin Potency on Activated Clotting Time during Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Authors:  Kiley Thompson; Jenn Alred; Amanda Deyo; Alicia N Sievert; Joseph J Sistino
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-09

3.  Influence of Body Mass Index on the Activated Clotting Time Under Weight-Based Heparin Dose.

Authors:  Xia Hong; Pei-Ren Shan; Wei-Jian Huang; Qian-Li Zhu; Fang-Yi Xiao; Sheng Li; Hao Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Perioperative Management of a Child with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome of the Jehovah's Witness Faith Presenting for Hybrid Comprehensive Stage II Procedure.

Authors:  Sathappan Karuppiah; Christopher Mckee; Ashley Hodge; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph Tobias; Aymen Naguib
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Anticoagulation Strategies in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Weight-Based vs. Concentration-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Justine Harnish; Kevin Beyer; Julie Collins
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2022-06

6.  Accuracy of point-of-care coagulation testing during cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient post COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Nimrat Grewal; David Yousef; Meindert Palmen; Robert Klautz; Jeroen Eikenboom; Jeroen Wink
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 7.  Management of Anticoagulation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Children.

Authors:  Madhuradhar Chegondi; Niranjan Vijayakumar; Balagangadhar R Totapally
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Heparin-protamine balance after neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Authors:  J A Peterson; S A Maroney; W Zwifelhofer; J P Wood; K Yan; R S Bercovitz; R K Woods; A E Mast
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Can We Rely on the Activated Clotting Time to Measure Heparin Anticoagulation? A Clinical Evaluation of Two ACT Monitors.

Authors:  Samuel Nilsson; Micael Appelblad; Staffan Svenmarker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-09

10.  Is There a "Blind Spot" in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Saskia Wand; Daniel Heise; Nadine Hillmann; Christian Bireta; Anselm Bräuer; Nicolas von Ahsen; Michael Quintel
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.