Literature DB >> 20519063

Behavioural and biological determinants of human sex ratio at birth.

William H James1.   

Abstract

The human sex ratio SR (proportion male) at birth has been reported to vary with many variables. The explanation of this variation is not established, but I have hypothesized that it is partially caused by the hormonal concentrations of both parents around the time of conception. The present note suggests how this hypothesis might accommodate recent sex ratio findings relating to 'psychosexual restriction', female genital cutting, sexes of prior sibs, finger length ratios, the autism spectrum disorder, parental occupation and maternal eating disorders. Tests of such suggestions are offered, and it is hypothesized that: (a) in women, Manning's R (the ratio of the lengths of the 2nd and 4th digits) is positively correlated with offspring sex ratio (proportion male); (b) women who have undergone female genital cutting (FGC) have high androgen levels; (c) offspring sex ratio correlates positively with 'masculinity' of parental occupation, the correlation being mediated by testosterone levels. It is noted that the lines of evidence for three hypotheses (James', Manning's and Baron-Cohen's) are mutually supportive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519063     DOI: 10.1017/S002193201000012X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosoc Sci        ISSN: 0021-9320


  7 in total

1.  No genetic contribution to variation in human offspring sex ratio: a total population study of 4.7 million births.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Hasse Walum; Paul Lichtenstein; Karin J H Verweij; Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Offspring sex ratio of Iranian dentists.

Authors:  Hadi Ghasemi; Seyedeh Reihaneh Mirdehghan; Mahshid Namdari; Fariborz Bayat
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Selection against small males in utero: a test of the Wells hypothesis.

Authors:  R Catalano; J Goodman; C E Margerison-Zilko; K B Saxton; E Anderson; M Epstein
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Hormonal evidence supports the theory of selection in utero.

Authors:  R A Catalano; K B Saxton; T A Bruckner; M Pearl; E Anderson; S Goldman-Mellor; C Margerison-Zilko; M Subbaraman; R J Currier; M Kharrazi
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Exposure to childhood traumas ups the odds of giving birth to daughters.

Authors:  Marsha Kaitz; Ann Marie Rokem; David Mankuta; Maayan Davidov; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Whatever the weather: ambient temperature does not influence the proportion of males born in New Zealand.

Authors:  Barnaby J Dixson; John Haywood; Philip J Lester; Diane K Ormsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ownership of dwelling affects the sex ratio at birth in Uganda.

Authors:  Bernard Wallner; Martin Fieder; Horst Seidler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.