Literature DB >> 20518689

Comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Mohamed Y F Aly1, Kosuke Tsutsumi, Masafumi Nakamura, Norihiro Sato, Shunichi Takahata, Junji Ueda, Shuji Shimizu, Alaa A Redwan, Masao Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has been shown to be an effective surgical option for benign lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. However, its advantages and disadvantages have not been well characterized. In this study, we compared the outcomes of LDP and open pancreatectomy performed in our clinic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peri- and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively compared between patients with benign pancreatic disorders who underwent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) (n = 35) and those who underwent LDP (n = 40). The peri- and postoperative factors analyzed included operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, biochemical findings, and complications.
RESULTS: LDP was associated with significantly less operative blood loss (363 versus 606 mL; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (22 versus 27 day; P = 0.009), but longer operative time (342 versus 250 min; P = 0.000), compared with ODP. There were no significant differences between the two groups in complication rates or postoperative recovery, except for the significantly shorter duration of postoperative pain-killer intake and earlier improvement of the biochemical analysis in LDP than in ODP.
CONCLUSIONS: LDP appears to be a safe, desirable procedure for the management of benign pancreatic diseases, with outcomes similar to ODP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20518689     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic three-port distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Gokulakkrishna Subhas; Natasha Gupta; Vijay K Mittal; Michael J Jacobs
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Xie; Yi-Ping Zhu; Xiao-Wu Xu; Ke Chen; Jia-Fei Yan; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Shuyin Liang; Usmaan Hameed; Shiva Jayaraman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: a single-center comparative study.

Authors:  Ippei Matsumoto; Keiko Kamei; Shumpei Satoi; Takaaki Murase; Masataka Matsumoto; Kohei Kawaguchi; Yuta Yoshida; Toshimitsu Iwasaki; Atsushi Takebe; Takuya Nakai; Yoshifumi Takeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant lesions in the pancreatic neck and proximal body.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Kwang-Min Park; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Dong Joo Lee; Jung Woo Lee; Eun Sung Jun; Sang Hyun Shin; Hyoung Eun Kim; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resections in two medium-sized medical centres.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Edoardo Rosso; Andrea Celotti; Giuseppe Zimmiti; Alberto Manzoni; Marco Garatti; Guido Tiberio; Nazario Portolani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies.

Authors:  Asri C Jusoh; Basil J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Jae Berm Park; Young Hoon Kim; Young Soo Jung; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Duck Jong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Postoperative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia After Major Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; Bradford J Kim; Yun Shin Segraves-Chun; Juan P Cata; Mark J Truty; Qiuling Shi; Alexander Holmes; Jose M Soliz; Keyuri U Popat; Thomas F Rahlfs; Jeffrey E Lee; Xin Shelley Wang; Jeffrey S Morris; Vijaya N R Gottumukkala; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Kiran Altaf; Jun J Xiong; Wei Huang; Muhammad A Javed; Gang Mai; Xu B Liu; Wei M Hu; Qing Xia
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.