Literature DB >> 20518437

Valence and arousal: a comparison of two sets of emotional facial expressions.

Dirk Adolph1, Georg W Alpers.   

Abstract

Facial expressions are often used in emotion research. Although they may differ in several relevant features such as the intensity of the facial expressions, the picture sets have not been compared systematically. Because the intensity of expressions is thought to determine the level of emotional arousal induced by the stimulus, the first aim of this study was to test whether 2 frequently used sets of emotional facial expressions induce different levels of perceived arousal. Furthermore, we tested whether the sex of the actor modulates arousal ratings. Participants viewed facial expressions from the NimStim set (more intense expressions) and the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces set (less intense expressions). Female expressions from the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces but male expressions from the NimStim set were rated as more emotionally arousing. We conclude that less intense female expressions but more intense male expressions may be more potent in inducing emotional responses. This study may encourage researchers to further compare the properties of picture sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20518437     DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  8 in total

1.  Affective engagement for facial expressions and emotional scenes: the influence of social anxiety.

Authors:  Bethany C Wangelin; Margaret M Bradley; Anna Kastner; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  How the visual brain detects emotional changes in facial expressions: Evidence from driven and intrinsic brain oscillations.

Authors:  Rafaela R Campagnoli; Matthias J Wieser; L Forest Gruss; Maeve R Boylan; Lisa M McTeague; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Facial features and head movements obtained with a webcam correlate with performance deterioration during prolonged wakefulness.

Authors:  Youngsun Kong; Hugo F Posada-Quintero; Matthew S Daley; Ki H Chon; Jeffrey Bolkhovsky
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Context counts! social anxiety modulates the processing of fearful faces in the context of chemosensory anxiety signals.

Authors:  Dirk Adolph; Lukas Meister; Bettina M Pause
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Avoidant decision making in social anxiety: the interaction of angry faces and emotional responses.

Authors:  Andre Pittig; Mirko Pawlikowski; Michelle G Craske; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-29

6.  KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.

Authors:  Margarida V Garrido; Marília Prada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Development and Validation of the Yonsei Face Database (YFace DB).

Authors:  Kyong-Mee Chung; Soojin Kim; Woo Hyun Jung; Yeunjoo Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-03

8.  What's in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories.

Authors:  T Tim A Höfling; Georg W Alpers; Björn Büdenbender; Ulrich Föhl; Antje B M Gerdes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.