Literature DB >> 22643041

Affective engagement for facial expressions and emotional scenes: the influence of social anxiety.

Bethany C Wangelin1, Margaret M Bradley, Anna Kastner, Peter J Lang.   

Abstract

Pictures of emotional facial expressions or natural scenes are often used as cues in emotion research. We examined the extent to which these different stimuli engage emotion and attention, and whether the presence of social anxiety symptoms influences responding to facial cues. Sixty participants reporting high or low social anxiety viewed pictures of angry, neutral, and happy faces, as well as violent, neutral, and erotic scenes, while skin conductance and event-related potentials were recorded. Acoustic startle probes were presented throughout picture viewing, and blink magnitude, probe P3 and reaction time to the startle probe also were measured. Results indicated that viewing emotional scenes prompted strong reactions in autonomic, central, and reflex measures, whereas pictures of faces were generally weak elicitors of measurable emotional response. However, higher social anxiety was associated with modest electrodermal changes when viewing angry faces and mild startle potentiation when viewing either angry or smiling faces, compared to neutral. Taken together, pictures of facial expressions do not strongly engage fundamental affective reactions, but these cues appeared to be effective in distinguishing between high and low social anxiety participants, supporting their use in anxiety research.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22643041      PMCID: PMC3407306          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  55 in total

1.  A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Radim Sara; Michiel Hagendoorn; Oren Marom; Paul Hughett; Larry Macy; Travis Turner; Ruzena Bajcsy; Aaron Posner; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation.

Authors:  F K Graham
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Dean Sabatinelli; Peter J Lang; Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons; Wayne King; Paramtap Desai
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing.

Authors:  M M Bradley; M Codispoti; B N Cuthbert; P J Lang
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2001-09

5.  Emotional stroop performance for masked angry faces: it's BAS, not BIS.

Authors:  Peter Putman; Erno Hermans; Jack van Honk
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-09

Review 6.  Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response.

Authors:  F K Graham; R K Clifton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Defensive startle response to emotional social cues in social anxiety.

Authors:  Matthew Garner; Greg Clarke; Hannah Graystone; David S Baldwin
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Modulation of event-related brain potentials during affective picture processing: a complement to startle reflex and skin conductance response?

Authors:  Christine Amrhein; Andreas Mühlberger; Paul Pauli; Georg Wiedemann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  The psychophysiology of anxiety disorder: fear memory imagery.

Authors:  Bruce N Cuthbert; Peter J Lang; Cyd Strauss; David Drobes; Christopher J Patrick; Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Reactions to facial expressions: effects of social context and speech anxiety on responses to neutral, anger, and joy expressions.

Authors:  Scott R Vrana; Daniel Gross
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  21 in total

1.  Prefrontal engagement by cognitive reappraisal of negative faces.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Heide Klumpp; Stewart A Shankman; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Imaging distributed and massed repetitions of natural scenes: spontaneous retrieval and maintenance.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Vincent D Costa; Vera Ferrari; Maurizio Codispoti; Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Face Perception in Social Anxiety: Visuocortical Dynamics Reveal Propensities for Hypervigilance or Avoidance.

Authors:  Lisa M McTeague; Marie-Claude Laplante; Hailey W Bulls; Joshua R Shumen; Peter J Lang; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  The Startle-Evoked Potential: Negative Affect and Severity of Pathology in Anxiety/Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Peter J Lang; David R Herring; Charlesynquette Duncan; Jan Richter; Christopher T Sege; Mathias Weymar; Anke Limberg-Thiesen; Alfons O Hamm; Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 5.  Emotional pictures and sounds: a review of multimodal interactions of emotion cues in multiple domains.

Authors:  Antje B M Gerdes; Matthias J Wieser; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Incongruence between Verbal and Non-Verbal Information Enhances the Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Shu Morioka; Michihiro Osumi; Mayu Shiotani; Satoshi Nobusako; Hiroshi Maeoka; Yohei Okada; Makoto Hiyamizu; Atsushi Matsuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Crossmodal interactions during affective picture processing.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Serena Mastria; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The duration of disgusted and fearful faces is judged longer and shorter than that of neutral faces: the attention-related time distortions as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological measurements.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Yunzhe Liu; Xiaochun Wang; Yuming Chen; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Social and emotional relevance in face processing: happy faces of future interaction partners enhance the late positive potential.

Authors:  Florian Bublatzky; Antje B M Gerdes; Andrew J White; Martin Riemer; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Selective control of attention supports the positivity effect in aging.

Authors:  Laura K Sasse; Matthias Gamer; Christian Büchel; Stefanie Brassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.