Literature DB >> 20518276

Rapid reporting of urine culture results: impact of the uro-quick screening system.

Arzu Ilki1, Pinar Bekdemir, Nurver Ulger, Guner Soyletir.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of the Uro-Quick (UQ) screening system (Alifax, Italy) for a rapid and accurate reporting of urine cultures, and whether it can provide bacterial yield to be used in identification and susceptibility testing. A total of 1480 urine samples collected between October 2006 and July 2008 were tested by conventional culture (CC) methods and UQ simultaneously. Sediments of positive UQ vials were used as bacterial yields for identification and susceptibility testing procedures. Of the 1480 samples, 999 revealed bacteria and/or leukocytes in direct microscopy. Among these 999 samples, positive growth was detected in 420 (42%) and 433 (43.3%) by UQ and CC, respectively. However, only 0.6% of samples without bacteria and leukocytes exhibited positive growth. When compared to CC, UQ demonstrated high levels of positive predictive value (95.9%), negative predictive value (94.8%), sensitivity (93%) and specificity (96.9%). Both CC isolates and UQ bacteria showed 81.3% concordance in identification results. Susceptibility testing of UQ bacteria displayed >90% agreement, when compared with standardized disk diffusion test. Our results indicate that UQ can reliably be used in routine laboratories giving microbial growth results in 3 hours. The most significant part of the study is that bacterial yields of UQ positive samples can be used in identification and susceptibility testing, allowing a rapid, same-day reporting of urine cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20518276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbiol        ISSN: 1121-7138            Impact factor:   2.479


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Alfred 60/AST device as a screening test for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Sophie Lahanas; George Stathopoulos; Raymond C Chan; Sebastiaan J van Hal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparative evaluation of Vitek 2 identification and susceptibility testing of urinary tract pathogens directly and isolated from chromogenic media.

Authors:  M J Munoz-Dávila; M Roig; G Yagüe; A Blázquez; C Salvador; M Segovia
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Technical notes on the correct configuration of the Alfred 60/AST device for the detection of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Gianpiero Spezzotti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of BiesseBioscreen as a new methodology for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  Eleonora Nicolai; Simona Garau; Cartesio Favalli; Cartesio D'Agostini; Enrico Gratton; Guido Motolese; Nicola Rosato
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a new system in ruling out negative urine cultures on the day of administration.

Authors:  A Ilki; R Ayas; S Ozsoy; G Soyletir
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship.

Authors:  L Coorevits; J Boelens; G Claeys
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Direct identification and susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacilli from turbid urine samples using VITEK2.

Authors:  Neelima Angaali; Laxmi Vemu; Chavali Padmasri; Neeraja Mamidi; Vijay Dharma Teja
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.