OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between resting distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) obtained during maximal hyperemia. BACKGROUND: FFR is an invasive index of the functional severity of a coronary artery stenosis determined from coronary pressure measurements. It is generally believed that there is little correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR obtained during maximal hyperemia. We have therefore studied this relationship in a large cohort of patients who had undergone pressure- wire assessments. METHODS: 528 consecutive pressure-wire studies performed in 483 patients over a 2-year period were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A linear correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR post-pharmacological hyperemia was observed (rho = 0.74; p < 0.0001). When a FFR of < or = 0.75 (or < or = 0.80 as per FAME) was defined as positive, a resting Pd/Pa of < or = 0.85 (< or = 0.87) had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95% (94.6%), while a resting Pd/Pa of > or = 0.93 (> or = 0.96) had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% (93%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a strong correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR. Resting values of Pd/Pa can be used to predict a positive FFR result with relatively high PPV and NPV. This may potentially obviate the need for adenosine infusion in a proportion of pressure-wire studies.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between resting distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) obtained during maximal hyperemia. BACKGROUND: FFR is an invasive index of the functional severity of a coronary artery stenosis determined from coronary pressure measurements. It is generally believed that there is little correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR obtained during maximal hyperemia. We have therefore studied this relationship in a large cohort of patients who had undergone pressure- wire assessments. METHODS: 528 consecutive pressure-wire studies performed in 483 patients over a 2-year period were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A linear correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR post-pharmacological hyperemia was observed (rho = 0.74; p < 0.0001). When a FFR of < or = 0.75 (or < or = 0.80 as per FAME) was defined as positive, a resting Pd/Pa of < or = 0.85 (< or = 0.87) had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95% (94.6%), while a resting Pd/Pa of > or = 0.93 (> or = 0.96) had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% (93%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a strong correlation between resting Pd/Pa and FFR. Resting values of Pd/Pa can be used to predict a positive FFR result with relatively high PPV and NPV. This may potentially obviate the need for adenosine infusion in a proportion of pressure-wire studies.
Authors: Nils P Johnson; Wenguang Li; Xi Chen; Barry Hennigan; Stuart Watkins; Colin Berry; William F Fearon; Keith G Oldroyd Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tim P van de Hoef; Joo Myung Lee; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hitoshi Matsuo; Manesh R Patel; Justin E Davies; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Stephen P Hoole; Paul A White; Philip A Read; Patrick M Heck; Nick E West; Michael O'Sullivan; David P Dutka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-02-09
Authors: Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn Meuwissen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Colin Berry; David Corcoran; Barry Hennigan; Stuart Watkins; Jamie Layland; Keith G Oldroyd Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Rajesh Sachdeva; Florim Cuculi; Javier Escaned; Christopher Broyd; Nicolas Foin; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Rodney A Foale; Iqbal Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Amarjit S Sethi; Mahmud Al-Bustami; Raffi R Kaprielian; Masood A Khan; Christopher S Baker; Michael F Bellamy; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Carlo Di Mario; Justin E Davies Journal: Heart Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 5.994