Steven C Adamson1, John W Bachman. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. bachman.john@mayo.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the use of e-visits in a primary care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot study of using the Internet for online care ("e-visits") was conducted in the Department of Family Medicine at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients in the department preregistered for the service, and then were able to use the online portal for consultations with their primary care physician. Use of the online portal was monitored and data were collected from November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2009. RESULTS: During the 2-year period, 4282 patients were registered for the service. Patients made 2531 online visits, and billings were made for 1159 patients. E-visits were submitted primarily by women during working hours and involved 294 different conditions. Of the 2531 e-visits, 62 (2%) included uploaded photographs, and 411 (16%) replaced nonbillable telephone protocols with billable encounters. The e-visits made office visits unnecessary in 1012 cases (40%); in 324 cases (13%), the patient was asked to schedule an appointment for a face-to-face encounter. CONCLUSION: Although limited in scope, to our knowledge this is the largest study of online visits in primary care using a structured history, allowing the patient to enter any problem, and billing the patient when appropriate. The extent of conditions possible for treatment by online care was far-ranging and was managed with a minimum of message exchanges by using structured histories. Processes previously given as a free service or by nurse triage and subject to malpractice (protocols) were now documented and billed.
OBJECTIVE: To study the use of e-visits in a primary care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot study of using the Internet for online care ("e-visits") was conducted in the Department of Family Medicine at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients in the department preregistered for the service, and then were able to use the online portal for consultations with their primary care physician. Use of the online portal was monitored and data were collected from November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2009. RESULTS: During the 2-year period, 4282 patients were registered for the service. Patients made 2531 online visits, and billings were made for 1159 patients. E-visits were submitted primarily by women during working hours and involved 294 different conditions. Of the 2531 e-visits, 62 (2%) included uploaded photographs, and 411 (16%) replaced nonbillable telephone protocols with billable encounters. The e-visits made office visits unnecessary in 1012 cases (40%); in 324 cases (13%), the patient was asked to schedule an appointment for a face-to-face encounter. CONCLUSION: Although limited in scope, to our knowledge this is the largest study of online visits in primary care using a structured history, allowing the patient to enter any problem, and billing the patient when appropriate. The extent of conditions possible for treatment by online care was far-ranging and was managed with a minimum of message exchanges by using structured histories. Processes previously given as a free service or by nurse triage and subject to malpractice (protocols) were now documented and billed.
Authors: James E Rohrer; Kurt B Angstman; Steven C Adamson; Matthew E Bernard; John W Bachman; Mark E Morgan Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: James D Ralston; David Carrell; Robert Reid; Melissa Anderson; Maureena Moran; James Hereford Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rachel Hess; Cindy L Bryce; Suzanne Paone; Gary Fischer; Kathleen M McTigue; Ellen Olshansky; Susan Zickmund; Katharine Fitzgerald; Linda Siminerio Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Beverly B Green; James D Ralston; Paul A Fishman; Sheryl L Catz; Andrea Cook; Jim Carlson; Lynda Tyll; David Carrell; Robert S Thompson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Warner V Slack; Hollis B Kowaloff; Roger B Davis; Tom Delbanco; Steven E Locke; Charles Safran; Howard L Bleich Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Carlos Musso; Jerónimo Aguilera; Carlos Otero; Manuel Vilas; Daniel Luna; Fernán González Bernaldo de Quirós Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Warner V Slack; Hollis B Kowaloff; Roger B Davis; Tom Delbanco; Steven E Locke; Howard L Bleich Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Frederick North; Sarah J Crane; Robert J Stroebel; Stephen S Cha; Eric S Edell; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ateev Mehrotra; Suzanne Paone; G Daniel Martich; Steven M Albert; Grant J Shevchik Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-05-19 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Oliver T Nguyen; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Jinhai Huo; Karim Hanna; Christopher M Shea; Kea Turner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428