Literature DB >> 20515632

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacing devices.

Francisco Buendía1, Juan M Sánchez-Gómez, María J Sancho-Tello, José Olagüe, Joaquín Osca, Oscar Cano, Miguel A Arnau, Begoña Igual.   

Abstract

Currently, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging is contraindicated in patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. This study was carried out because the potential risks in this situation need to be clearly defined. This prospective study evaluated clinical and electrical parameters before and after magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 33 patients (five with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and 28 with pacemakers). In these patients, magnetic resonance imaging was considered clinically essential. There were no clinical complications. There was a temporary communication failure in two cases, sensing errors during imaging in two cases, and a safety signal was generated in one pacemaker at the maximum magnetic resonance frequency and output level. There were no technical restrictions on imaging nor were there any permanent changes in the performance of the cardiac pacing device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515632     DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(10)70149-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  6 in total

1.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging interactions with a sacral neuromodulation system.

Authors:  Xuechen Huang; Guangqiang Jay Jiang
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs.

Authors:  Jerold S Shinbane; Patrick M Colletti; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?

Authors:  Peter Nordbeck; Georg Ertl; Oliver Ritter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  The Kora Pacemaker is Safe and Effective for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Arnaud Savouré; Alexis Mechulan; Marc Burban; Audrey Olivier; Arnaud Lazarus
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.