Literature DB >> 20515383

Practical considerations in equating progress tests.

Michelle M Langer1, David B Swanson.   

Abstract

Progress testing offers a unique contribution to medical education assessment in that it provides a tool for monitoring examinees' growth over time and their progress toward graduation objectives. However, one of the most important psychometric requirements of progress testing has typically been neglected in past applications: scores across the time and test forms are not commonly placed on the same scale. Equating is a method used to achieve this property. This article discusses the basic principles of equating and the particular challenges posed by progress testing. A hybrid equating method, along with the details of a recent application, is presented as a potential solution, and alternate approaches to equating are discussed. It is hoped that future applications of progress testing will both utilize equating and demonstrate its value as a tool in medical education assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515383     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  Current state and future directions of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners.

Authors:  Norman E Ouzts; Igor Himelfarb; Bruce L Shotts; Andrew R Gow
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2020-01-07

2.  The use of progress testing.

Authors:  Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-10

3.  Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.

Authors:  Jane Holland; Robin O'Sullivan; Richard Arnett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Exploring pooled analysis of pretested items to monitor the performance of medical students exposed to different curriculum designs.

Authors:  Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho; Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção; Joélcio Francisco Abbade; Dario Cecílio-Fernandes; Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori; Angélica Maria Bicudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.