Literature DB >> 20515189

Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention.

Menahem Yeari1, Morris Goldsmith1.   

Abstract

Is object-based attention mandatory or under strategic control? In an adapted spatial cuing paradigm, participants focused initially on a central arrow cue that was part of a perceptual group (Experiment 1) or a uniformly connected object (Experiment 2), encompassing one of the potential target locations. The cue always pointed to an opposite, different-object location. By varying cue validity, the strategic incentive to prevent the spread of attention to the entire cue object, and consequently to the same-object location, was manipulated: With invalid cuing and (consequently) equal probability of targets at same-object and different-object locations, a same-object target identification advantage was observed. With highly valid cuing and targets much more probable at the different-object location than at the same-object location, the same-object advantage disappeared. Object-based attention appears to be a default mode that may be ecologically adaptive but can be overridden by strategic control when there is a strong immediate benefit in doing so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515189     DOI: 10.1037/a0016897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.

Authors:  Adam S Greenberg; Maya Rosen; Elizabeth Cutrone; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Shaping attention with reward: effects of reward on space- and object-based selection.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Jacoba Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-10-11

3.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

4.  Feature-based attention is not confined by object boundaries: Spatially global enhancement of irrelevant features.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Dividing attention between two transparent motion surfaces results in a failure of selective attention.

Authors:  Zachary Raymond Ernst; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The differential effects of reward on space- and object-based attentional allocation.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Object Selection by Automatic Spreading of Top-Down Attentional Signals in V1.

Authors:  Matthias Ekman; Pieter R Roelfsema; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention.

Authors:  Fengpei Hu; Changyong Jiao; Songpo Zhao; Huahua Dong; Xiao Liu; Yuji Yi; Jun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Location-Specific Orientation Set Is Independent of the Horizontal Benefit with or Without Object Boundaries.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Ailsa Humphries; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-14

10.  fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Elliot D Freeman; Emiliano Macaluso; Geraint Rees; Jon Driver
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.